Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 42

Thread: Does Compiz Still Slow Down Your System?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,419

    Default Does Compiz Still Slow Down Your System?

    Phoronix: Does Compiz Still Slow Down Your System?

    There have been a flurry of comments this week following my post why software defaults are important and why in the Linux benchmarks at Phoronix.com the tests are most often carried out in their default/stock configurations: it's what most everyone uses. There have been comments by Ted Ts'o on file-system default mount options and whether they are sane or not in the non-enterprise distributions and others have questioned if defaults like Compiz on in Ubuntu by default makes sense. Does using Compiz still hurt your graphics performance?

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=15780

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,311

    Default

    If it hurts my 3D performance, I don't notice it, because I don't play demanding games. As for desktop usage, the r600c/g drivers have run Compiz with many effects enabled extremely smoothly (better than EXA) for a while now.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    18

    Default Gallium3D

    Looking at those results, mostly on Nvidia side, makes me wonder how much efforts are being dedicated by Gallium3D team to improve performance on Gallium3D infraestructure.

    Does anyone know if there is any work beeing done to improve Gallium3D infraestructure performance in the wild?

    I didn't notice any special/cool patch for Gallium3D on 2.6.38. I could be wrong, and wish to Please correct me if i'm wrong....

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,283

    Default

    Nice of you to cast doubt of FUD into conclusions based on your own article

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    46

    Default

    No it doesn't. But it is annoying that desktop behavior (shortcuts, virtual screens and so on) changes with compiz and without it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,933

    Default

    Now we know how to make Michael do new benchmarks

    Does Metacity in Ubuntu use compositing? Because that's what made 3d apps slower under Compiz. If Metacity uses compositing as well now, then it's no wonder that the results are closer.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    989

    Default

    What happened to the Catalyst team starting around late 2009 and through 2010 to the present? Their driver stopped sucking. Maybe they got lucky and hired one or more brilliant minds.

    Now if only we can make it not suck and make it open source. Damn. The numbers for r?00g are encouraging though.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,933

    Default

    FWIW, I have a PCI card (not express) in my computer, and there is a very apparent difference between fullscreen video (no compositing) and windowed video (composited environment) in KWin.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    629

    Default

    Hi Michael,

    I have noticed too that Compiz mostly doesn't decrease performance. However, KWin does and the difference can be huge. It would be cool if you made an article that compares:
    - Gnome without Compiz
    - Gnome with Compiz
    - KDE without KWin
    - KDE with KWin

    I bet the numbers will be very interesting.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,933

    Default

    I've made a quick check with glxgears:

    PCI 4350:
    KWin (+compositing): 240
    KWin (-compositing): 440

    PCI-E 4550:
    KWin (+compositing): 2400
    KWin (-compositing): 3050

    Glxgears is not a benchmark, but it does stress the copying. The terrible performance of the PCI card and the huge hit it gets from compositing make me believe that the problem is in the extra blit, caused by the compositing environment.

    If I recall correctly (it's all muddy and I'm not a developer), the extra blitting causes a large hit with Mesa drivers in general. This is also why the KMS path was so much slower when it was first introduced, right?

    The binary blobs have it really well-optimised.

    That's why a check with a non-compositing window manager would be useful.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •