Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 63

Thread: An OpenGL 4.1 Gallium3D State Tracker Was Just Proposed

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    90

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Awesomeness View Post
    Getting into FOSS just for the money… boy, I hate GSOC. It has corrupted the whole FOSS community.
    Either he wants to develop that, then he should do it right now and not “maybe in summer if I get accepted”.
    FAIL!

    (who pays the bills while spending time on this task? Developing a state tracker beside the job...? ha ha)

  2. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pickup View Post
    ... OpenGL 3/4 linux implementation is stopped by those f***ed patents.
    Will be ever possible to do something GL3/4 without having to pay someone $ 1,241,452,883,945,814,664,741,093 for every single working OpenGL thing + 3,121,532 years in prison on Pluto (years of Pluto, not Earth)?
    This guy is French. As most of the world doesn't live in USA, most of the world doesn't have to bother with software patent infringement and paying fees or spend time in jail for such dumb reasons. Also even if only the half of the specification could be implemented, that would be a win for the linux graphic stack.

    But this guy is way too ambitious. You can follow one of its project here http://www.logram-project.org/, also very very very very (...) ambitious, a translation of the beginning of the introduction : "Logram is a GNU/Linux distribution project which aim is to bring, if possible, a new impulse to the (F)OSS ecosystem."

    I think that aiming at an efficient OpenGL ES 2.0 or OpenGL3.x implementation would have been more reasonable (even if still very ambitious).

    Anyway,
    Je lui souhaite bonne chance !

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    427

    Default

    It would be cool if parts of this work were made available in a library, like egl, so that projects like Wayland could use it.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    It seems like he has the knowledge, a plan with clear cut milestones and the right spirit. He _has_ to be overly ambitious to face the work.

    If he doesn't get it finnished, he at least layed down the groundwork. This is FLOSS you know.

    I also read about some stupid corruption comment. In the summer students need to work tovearn money for college and other things. He needs time as well so why not apply for GSoC?

    I wish him the best of luck and I like to see his idea turn into a working state tracker! ^^,

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    365

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by loonyphoenix View Post
    I think the laws on software patents in Belgium are much saner than in the US. It might not be an issue for him.
    Fwiw, I guess this might actually fall under US law since he'd do this work as a Google employee.

    I'm not a lawyer though and this is just an assumption of mine.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xheyther View Post
    This guy is French.
    Last time I checked we were not invaded by the French.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by loonyphoenix View Post
    I think the laws on software patents in Belgium are much saner than in the US. It might not be an issue for him.
    Quote Originally Posted by Xheyther View Post
    This guy is French. As most of the world doesn't live in USA, most of the world doesn't have to bother with software patent infringement and paying fees or spend time in jail for such dumb reasons.
    I think you guys are missing the point. Because of the patent issues support like this cannot be enabled by default in most distros leaving the end user to compile items from scratch if they wish to have that support enabled.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Creve Coeur, Missouri
    Posts
    394

    Default

    Finally, someone who doesn't want to put up with Mesa's insane bureaucracy. I am glad someone is actually doing something, rather than worrying about software patents, of which in court could probably all be proven as prior art.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LinuxID10T View Post
    Finally, someone who doesn't want to put up with Mesa's insane bureaucracy. I am glad someone is actually doing something, rather than worrying about software patents, of which in court could probably all be proven as prior art.
    Got any proof of that "prior art" statement?

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Creve Coeur, Missouri
    Posts
    394

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    Got any proof of that "prior art" statement?
    What should I attack first?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •