Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: GTK+ HTML Back-End Merged For GTK+ 3.2

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,155

    Default

    It has been way, way to long to read some quality GTK/GNOME bash, hijacking a related news from the first post on. BlackStar, where are you?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    353

    Default

    First off, there'll prolly be some security sandboxing stuff, who knows how intrusive/scary/confusing and (un)intuitive that's gonna be, second, that's prolly gonna be used by javascript, hence forget about all performance related apps like HandBrake, third Gnome 3 came a lot later than first planned - same could happen with this project, forth it only sounds plausible but it's likely just a toy project, and last but not least, who knows how the apis will (have to) be changed to take into account all the stuff that changes when you go from the desktop into the browser. It feels a lot like Chrome OS - overhyped as something new & cool but really just a toy that Google failed to deliver and when people try it they (finally) realize there's hardly serious reasons for non-techies to use it on a daily basis. Just my 0.04$ (0.04 because of inflation).

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    .ro/.ca
    Posts
    232

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cl333r View Post
    that's prolly gonna be used by javascript, hence forget about all performance related apps like HandBrake
    GDK handles the drawing (and window events,...) of a GTK application. With broadway, the application will still run on the server, not in the client's browser. So don't "forget about performance related apps like HandBrake".

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,146

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by d2kx View Post
    It has been way, way to long to read some quality GTK/GNOME bash, hijacking a related news from the first post on. BlackStar, where are you?
    I'm watching from the shadows.

    First off, there'll prolly be some security sandboxing stuff, who knows how intrusive/scary/confusing and (un)intuitive that's gonna be, second, that's prolly gonna be used by javascript, hence forget about all performance related apps like HandBrake, third Gnome 3 came a lot later than first planned - same could happen with this project, forth it only sounds plausible but it's likely just a toy project, and last but not least, who knows how the apis will (have to) be changed to take into account all the stuff that changes when you go from the desktop into the browser. It feels a lot like Chrome OS - overhyped as something new & cool but really just a toy that Google failed to deliver and when people try it they (finally) realize there's hardly serious reasons for non-techies to use it on a daily basis. Just my 0.04$ (0.04 because of inflation).
    From the previous discussion on Phoronix, there's no sandboxing or anything. Everything is rendered on the server via vanilla GTK+ and then transferred to the HTML browser. In other words, this is equivalent to a VNC connection from inside the browser.

    It's still better than KDE4, anyway.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    17

    Default

    What would clients need in order to display an app like that (Besides an HTML5-capable browser)?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •