Yeah, it's about synergies in a more general form, not 'patches'. Makes sense.
It sounds like they'd be offering tech support/advice (e.g. "oh yeah, are you doing <reasonable-seeming thing>? That will hang the ASIC. We spent <number> days tracking that down on the simulator last week; we fixed it by <brief abstract description of workaround>") rather than contributing patches directly.
Yeah, it's about synergies in a more general form, not 'patches'. Makes sense.
quick question.
tried ubuntu natty with the open source drivers lately.
the compiz effects, when switching the desktop and stuff like that are jerky.
is this ubuntu or the driver?
(im on a mobilty hd4570)
Great! After this I hope that AMD will put some guy on CoreBoot.
Then everything will be great in Free Software Ville.![]()
Thanks for the explanation. However, I wonder how the development process looks like then. Of course you can now ask for help getting into it. But you can't implement the code in the same way due to legal concerns, AFAIK? Nowadays it's easier, you can just take a look into the CS source and see how it can't be implemented in the OS driver. BTW, this should be valid vice versa. Maybe I'm completely mistaken?
From the new:
I`m interested in this target, i`m embedded developer, and i usually make drivers for Linux (i did some net drivers), but i would like to improve my 3D/GPU drivers, how could i help? I see the learning curve a little bit high, but i would like to help in any way.For now though there's still plenty to be done besides dreaming of the day of same-day open-source KMS and Gallium3D support. You can be supporting AMD with your hardware purchases and working on the open-source drivers yourself. Even if you're not an experienced developer, there's still valuable contributions to be made in terms of testing, documentation, etc. Ask on our forums if you're looking for ways to get involved.
__
Methril
Rafael Campos Las Heras