Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Avivo vs. Fglrx Driver In GtkPerf

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,913

    Default Avivo vs. Fglrx Driver In GtkPerf

    Phoronix: Avivo vs. Fglrx Driver In GtkPerf

    While the Avivo driver doesn't yet contain 3D functionality or support a number of features found in the official fglrx driver and the community Radeon driver, it is making steady progress despite its age. Most recently with the open-source R500 driver implementing shadow frame-buffer support, we have experienced a noticeable increase in performance. As we have begun to receive messages from those interested in this driver wondering about the performance capabilities, we have carried out a brief GtkPerf test comparing the Avivo git code to ATI's official binary "fglrx" display driver.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=10533

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,150

    Default

    This is very interesting. It would be nice to know how fast nvidia is.

    It seems that fglrx really sucks.

    I hope and think that fglrx 8.39 comes out anytime now till friday.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    64

    Default

    Everybody knows fglrx sucks but as far as I understand this ShadowFB switch, the new Avivo driver beats the fglrx by computing nearly everything on the CPU utilizing system RAM. So maybe fglrx has some kind of hardware "acceleration" for 2D operations, but who cares nowadays.

    Really impressive work for now, I hope we can get rid of fglrx as soon as possible...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •