Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Another Benefit To Wayland: Its Screensaver

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,765

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    My computer's purpose is to help me do whatever I want/must, not entertaining other people.

    That said screensavers are ten times more stupid than MS Clippy (yeah I just said that) because they have absolutely zero purpose. And if you want entertainment than Clippy's animation are more entertaining than stinking midget feet (Gnome screensaver) supposedly walking all over the inside of your screen.

    No thanks...
    you underestimate the effect and how important beauty is for the people. Even if it is without purpose watching something beautiful on the screen > blanc screen.

    As for the argument of power consumption i believe its up to the user to decide.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 89c51 View Post
    you underestimate the effect and how important beauty is for the people. Even if it is without purpose watching something beautiful on the screen > blanc screen.
    I could understand it if it was to be a piece of static art in the case you have a beautiful LED screen mounted to your livingroom wall, otherwise I realy don't see the point of having screensavers.

    The purpose of an OS is not to entertain your office neighbours. By your reason for beauty; maybe we should make a dialog in Fedora whenever you home partition is decrypted, like this:



    Cool, huh?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    146

    Default

    Count me in with the "screensavers are useless" crowd. I think '98 was the last time I even had one enabled on a machine.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,587

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    I could understand it if it was to be a piece of static art in the case you have a beautiful LED screen mounted to your livingroom wall
    And there are people like that. Once walked into a home where the guy had 9 30" Apple Cinema displays on a wall with the Euphoria screensaver running for "decor" purposes. At the time that was about 30k worth of displays.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Arctic circle, Finland
    Posts
    305

    Default

    Oh boy, let screensavers die along with crts...

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Last time i used a screen saver was at a party. Projecting it on the people with a DLP makes a great substitute for laser

    They may be usefull for some other specific stuff, but mostly not

    I do set up the screen saver and monitor power off to a dt of 1 min between them. This way if i need the screen i have a "warning" before the screen goes off, so i can save some power cycles to it and maybe prolong its life this way

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,153

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ashc View Post
    Last time i used a screen saver was at a party. Projecting it on the people with a DLP makes a great substitute for laser

    They may be usefull for some other specific stuff, but mostly not

    I do set up the screen saver and monitor power off to a dt of 1 min between them. This way if i need the screen i have a "warning" before the screen goes off, so i can save some power cycles to it and maybe prolong its life this way
    This is a pretty good idea, actually! I think I'll try this myself.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    880

    Default

    Whether or not you believe a screensaver should display a beautiful image or animation or not is one thing, but when you lock your screen so it prevents people from either being able to use the machine or read the contents of the screen, it needs to do that properly and reliably.

    The way things are now, if you can arrange it so that the screen saver process dies, bingo, you're back in to the machine. But even if you can't manage that, usually when you hit a key after the screen saver has been started, you get a flicker of the contents of the screen under the screen saver. Not very private, and is one thing that will get addressed by this improvement.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •