Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: NTFS-3G Merges With NTFSprogs, Plus New Version

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,597

    Default NTFS-3G Merges With NTFSprogs, Plus New Version

    Phoronix: NTFS-3G Merges With NTFSprogs, Plus New Version

    The NTFS-3G project, which provides a file-system driver with read/write support for Microsoft's NTFS file-system on Linux, has merged with ntfsprogs. The ntfsprogs package provides various utilities for the Linux NTFS file-system like mkntfs, ntfsclone, ntfsundelete, and ntfsdefrag. Merging NTFS-3G and ntfsprogs was the logical move and now there's a stable release of the merged software: ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=OTMxNQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,123

    Default

    Can't remember when I last thought about NTFS support. For the past years with mainstreams distributions, it just worked (TM).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,613

    Default

    You usally see no huge problems with older version when you just access a few files. When you copy several gigabytes of data and compare the speed then you will see definitely differences. I usually try to use current versions of ntfs-3g for Kanotix (definitely newer compared to U/D). This time the packageing seems to be more tricky, best would be if the original maintainer would update it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by d2kx View Post
    Can't remember when I last thought about NTFS support. For the past years with mainstreams distributions, it just worked (TM).
    Same here, oh how I used to hate having to install a stupid extra external module in Redhat just to get even read support of NTFS.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    989

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix
    ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2011.4.12
    My, that's quite a mouthful! How about ntfsprogs-3g, or nixtfs (a portmanteau of "NIX" and "ntfs"), or something else a bit shorter? :P

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by allquixotic View Post
    My, that's quite a mouthful! How about ntfsprogs-3g, or nixtfs (a portmanteau of "NIX" and "ntfs"), or something else a bit shorter? :P
    They could have just called it NTFSprogs and made life for people easier.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    882

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    Same here, oh how I used to hate having to install a stupid extra external module in Redhat just to get even read support of NTFS.
    Yeah, but be honest, if you are using Red Hat you don't need NTFS support because you're migrating from UNIX.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yogi_berra View Post
    Yeah, but be honest, if you are using Red Hat you don't need NTFS support because you're migrating from UNIX.
    Not really, that was the days before even Fedora existed and Red Hat wasn't just an enterprise solution.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    I also don't miss having to manually compile and install alsa support from those days.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    Not really, that was the days before even Fedora existed and Red Hat wasn't just an enterprise solution.
    Red Hat has its reason to avoid shipping it. However EPEL project does include ntfs-3g and it is quite a popular repository

    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL

    I wouldn't use EL without it.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •