Hi,
what's the current situation/state with "GL_ARB_depth_clamp" extension on r300g, because it's disabled?
Thanks.
Hi,
what's the current situation/state with "GL_ARB_depth_clamp" extension on r300g, because it's disabled?
Thanks.
I tested it with openarena, disabled swapbufferswait for full performace. With my x1600 256 mb i think there is a vram limit. I got an impressive speed increase from 62 to 84 fps @ 800x600, but with higher res the speed even decreased a tiny bit from 43 to 42 fps @ 1024x768 and 29 to 28 fps @ 1280x1024. So if you use the RADEON_HYPERZ=1 override use a benchmark to verify. I dont have got a faster card with more vram to do a better test. It was definitely not cpu limited with my i7-880.
Look there:
http://kanotix.com/files/fix/oss-test/readme.txt
In that dir you find scripts which patch the driver (or enable gallium) when you add any option. I used pts to benchmark openarena. Maybe i begin a new profile next time.
Ah, I downloaded pts and now I see how the OA benchmark is done. I'll have to compile the latest drivers, it's been a while for I was quite happy with the last one.
9600M, mesa 7.10, swapbufferwait 0, vblank_mode 0, hyperz 0->1
800x600: 65.4 -> 72.8 (11%)
1024x768: 48.4 -> 56.9 (17%)
This was locking the CPU to its maximum frequency. If I don't do that the frame rate is worse, but the improvement due to hyperz is more noticeable (56.9 to 65.7 at 800x600, 15% better).
Very nice indeed!
Did you do
dmesg|grep nouveau|grep core
to see if your gpu is running at full speed? i dont think so, looks so slow. ask in irc://irc.freenode.net/#nouveau then when c (current) is not the max.