Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: LLVM's Clang Now Successfully Builds Qt

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,388

    Default LLVM's Clang Now Successfully Builds Qt

    Phoronix: LLVM's Clang Now Successfully Builds Qt

    A week after the release of LLVM 2.9 with Clang, it now appears that it's successfully building the Qt library. Not only is Clang being boot-strapped and compiling Qt4, but it's also building the WebKit module. Once everything's built, it's working and even the Flash module is working from within there...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=OTMxNg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    565

    Default wow!

    It would be nice to benchmark Qt applications as built with GCC vs LLVM!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Once this can build Linux. BSD and KDE, there is no GNU/ in Linux anymore. Not that removing all FSF software is great, but it would be funny to shove that into RMS' face.

    All due respect for RMS, though. If HURD would be stable and included KMS+Gallium I might be running Debian/GNU/HURD bleeding edge.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Once this can build Linux. BSD and KDE, there is no GNU/ in Linux anymore. Not that removing all FSF software is great, but it would be funny to shove that into RMS' face.
    Maybe there's no GNU/ in the name, but there's a lot of GNU software and will be. I prefer to use and support GNU software than BSD. Even if Clang will be able to build Linux it has to also reach performance parity with GCC. Keep in mind GNU != GPL and the GPL is the most important license in FLOSS (no surprise it's the most widely used in Open Source projects). Linux and BSDs owns GNU a lot, but it doesn't mean we should say GNU/Linux, GNU/BSD. More correct is KDE/Linux, Gnome/Linux, but this sucks. I'd also like to see some performance comparison between desktop application with different compilers used. However, I have no idea how to make such benchmark.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,002

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Once this can build Linux. BSD and KDE, there is no GNU/ in Linux anymore. Not that removing all FSF software is great, but it would be funny to shove that into RMS' face.
    Don't forget that GNOME is also part of the GNU project. Compilers and kernels are only of interest to a small subset of GNU/Linux users and BSD and KDE are irrelevant.

    But this GNU/Linux thing is really an old battle. Nowadays most people just call it Ubuntu .

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by monraaf View Post
    Don't forget that GNOME is also part of the GNU project. Compilers and kernels are only of interest to a small subset of GNU/Linux users and BSD and KDE are irrelevant.
    *Hmphff* Everybody knows Gnome is irrelevant

    Anyway... I was justing pointing out that it would be funny to make a totaly non-GNU OS and show it to RMS

    But this GNU/Linux thing is really an old battle. Nowadays most people just call it Ubuntu .
    Lol true that. BTW I don't care what people call it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,587

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    non-GNU OS and show it to RMS
    It's been done before, it's just a royal PITA to setup. Some linux kernel based firmwares for example do not use the GNU toolchain.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,801

    Default

    Who cares who made it. All I care is that it works

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    972

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    Who cares who made it. All I care is that it works
    Exactly!

    When LLVM can build a rock-stable Linux/BSD kernel that runs fine as well as any desktop of choice as well as a complete userland I'd then call it a success.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeepDayze View Post
    When LLVM can build a rock-stable Linux/BSD kernel that runs fine as well as any desktop of choice as well as a complete userland I'd then call it a success.
    But anything in between is progress

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •