Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: The Intel Mesa Driver Gets Closer To OpenGL 3.0

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,393

    Default The Intel Mesa Driver Gets Closer To OpenGL 3.0

    Phoronix: The Intel Mesa Driver Gets Closer To OpenGL 3.0

    The open-source Mesa / Gallium3D Linux drivers not only take heat for their slow performance (in many cases, dreadfully slow) compared to the proprietary drivers, their bugs causing issues like those with KWin, and their inability to run many games/applications, but also for their very belated support in enabling support for new OpenGL extensions and versions of the GL Shading Language...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=OTM1OA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    10

    Default

    As a intel graphics owner i very excited for this. I wan't my X3TC, damnit. Anybody even knows what kind of patents they are consedered of

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    141

    Default

    GLSL 1.30 was started months ago. The documentation was recently updated to reflect this, but it is still not news to anyone who has been paying attention to Mesa development.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,516

    Default

    why it is so difficult for intel to move to Gallium3d???

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    295

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 89c51 View Post
    why it is so difficult for intel to move to Gallium3d???
    Various excuses. Dave Airlie said this in #intel-gfx the other day

    Code:
    <airlied> its like the gallium argument also, a) gallium isn't ready b) we'd have to rewrite our driver
    <airlied> so a isn't true any more, and b is happening to move to GLSL IR
    <airlied> so b was just an excuse
    I'll probably happen eventually.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mattst88 View Post
    Various excuses. Dave Airlie said this in #intel-gfx the other day

    Code:
    <airlied> its like the gallium argument also, a) gallium isn't ready b) we'd have to rewrite our driver
    <airlied> so a isn't true any more, and b is happening to move to GLSL IR
    <airlied> so b was just an excuse
    I'll probably happen eventually.
    just out of curiosity

    is there any timeframe for that or "official" info by the devs??

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    295

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 89c51 View Post
    just out of curiosity

    is there any timeframe for that or "official" info by the devs??
    No. Not even any plans that I know of.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    82

    Default

    I'll probably happen sometime after i915g is in a more or less stable state, which can still take a while.

    Any yes, people interested in the development going on in mesa should just bookmark the cgit and take a look once every day.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    872

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LiquidAcid View Post
    I'll probably happen sometime after i915g is in a more or less stable state, which can still take a while.
    No, it will never happen if they don't code for gallium

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,903

    Default

    It's definitely not going to happen unless Gallium gets ported to support GLSL IR instead of (or in addition to) TGSI. Intel developed that IR themselves, and seem pretty in love with it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •