Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 67

Thread: How Hardware Companies Determine Their Linux Base

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,791

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kivada View Post
    No, the only way to get Nvidia to notice is to beat them over the head by purchasing AMD hardware because on their lack of OSS support. Don't get distracted by the VDPAU cookie.
    Get NVidia to notice what exactly? Their drivers are top notch. If someone needs to notice, it's AMD with their fglrx, not NVidia.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Arctic circle, Finland
    Posts
    287

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kivada View Post
    No, the only way to get Nvidia to notice is to beat them over the head by purchasing AMD hardware because on their lack of OSS support. Don't get distracted by the VDPAU cookie.
    Would not make a difference, main reason why nvidia makes linux drivers are professional markets(quadro, tesla. For them drivers have to work). To making drivers for geforces too is then easy for them.

  3. #13

    Default

    some ideas:
    you could enable smolt or popcon (debian and ubuntu). and sign up at linuxcounter. those help people get estimates of number of linux users.

    buy computers from vendors that preinstall linux. http://nakedcomputers.org/ has a fairly big list. when these vendors do large orders from the manufactures they will talk to them about compatibility and drivers.

    fill in those registration card that you get with hardware.

    email everyone in the supply chain and ask them if a device supports linux. they may not know, or just say 'we dont support linux', but if enough people do it then they may look into it. look at how successful the organic and fairtrade food movements are.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    71

    Default counter.li.org - shame it's not used more

    http://counter.li.org/

    I also allowed opensuse to install SMOLT on my computers.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    437

    Default

    Probably wouldn't have much effect, but I just had an idea for a UA string:

    "<BROWSER> <OS> (<KERNEL> <KVERSION>) [ARCH]"
    e.g.: "Chrome Fedora (Linux 2.6.38)", or "Firefox 4 / Fedora (Linux 2.6.38) x86_64"

    Short, informative, and not verbose. ;-)

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    988

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kivada View Post
    Don't get distracted by the VDPAU cookie.
    Why not? There are plenty of people who don't really care that much about 3D and games and stuff but do care about video decode acceleration. VDPAU gives you that, sure their drivers are closed source but so is AMD's competing XvBA implementation. On the open source side there's nothing on both sides.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,929

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by monraaf View Post
    Why not? There are plenty of people who don't really care that much about 3D and games and stuff but do care about video decode acceleration. VDPAU gives you that, sure their drivers are closed source but so is AMD's competing XvBA implementation. On the open source side there's nothing on both sides.
    Not quite yet, but there is working XvMC for r600+ hardware and a h264 state tracker in progress.

    That said, it will probably work just as well with nouveau as it will with radeon after a bit of tweaking.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,929

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    Get NVidia to notice what exactly?
    The demand for free drivers and open specs.

    Nvidia could get away with being the only major hardware manufacturer with completely closed specs for a while because they were the only ones with reasonable Linux support.

    This is slowly changing. r300g has top notch performance, the r600+ drivers are maturing and work is starting on optimisations, OpenGL 3 support in Mesa is virtually around the corner, video decoding is on the way for Gallium3d.

    None of this will probably beat the blob in pure performance, but it's bound to be close enough that most people will not care, and will not wish to deal with installing secretive binaries if they have open drivers which work out of the box.

  9. #19

    Default

    Hmmm, I believe John Bridgman said here that even if they had the whole nix* home market it would not cover the costs of their OSS team, so I doubt Nvidia (w/sh)ould care.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,458

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AnonymousCoward View Post
    Hmmm, I believe John Bridgman said here that even if they had the whole nix* home market it would not cover the costs of their OSS team, so I doubt Nvidia (w/sh)ould care.
    I'm not sure which comment you're referencing, but that doesn't sound quite right. Best guess is that I said something along the lines of "even if we had the whole *nix home market it would not cover the costs of developing an OSS stack comparable to the proprietary driver", or something like that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •