Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 46

Thread: Attachmate Completes Its Novell Acquisition

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    55

    Default OpenSuse-Tumbleweed

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    Actually it is thriving quite well and has had a good inrush of new adopters lately.

    But hey, it is far more dramatic to make a Henny Penny comment isn't it?

    (we have heard this all before when Novell purchased SuSE, the same "the sky is falling" comments were made then)
    I've been running openSuse with Tumbleweed and been quite happy. Now running the 2.6.38.4 kernel with KDE 4.6.2. Aside from a couple freezes everything's working fine.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LenS View Post
    I've been running openSuse with Tumbleweed and been quite happy. Now running the 2.6.38.4 kernel with KDE 4.6.2. Aside from a couple freezes everything's working fine.
    Been a long long long time member of SuSE/openSUSE as well, that's why I find all these "the world is ending" type comments amusing having seen them again and again over the years.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,721

    Default

    Technically, Nokia could still do a 180 the second the contract ends (3 years?), and this acceptance-of-the-bribe would just have been a decoy while getting a full lineup of meego phones developed and ready.

    Ah, who am I kidding.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Not to kick openSuSE lovers in the jewels, but what makes openSuSE so much different/better than Ubuntu, Debian or Fedora?

    SuSE was my first distro, but that's the only reason I've ever used it.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Nurnberg.
    Posts
    302

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Not to kick openSuSE lovers in the jewels, but what makes openSuSE so much different/better than Ubuntu, Debian or Fedora?

    SuSE was my first distro, but that's the only reason I've ever used it.
    Well, during the radeonhd timeframe (oktober 2008?), i was told that some bug we were seeing, which ATI wasn't, was opensuse specific, and ATI wasn't very helpful on providing details or even on installing a single opensuse quickly. So after a lot of back and forth I went and installed several versions of the three named other distributions on the same test machine.

    They all compared rather badly to an opensuse when just wanting to go from an install CD to a working system, with a bit of partitioning in between. With Debian (my personal favourite, even over suse), i got the bare console that i wanted, lots of apt-getting needed to be able to build radeonhd. With ubuntu, i felt treated like some grandmother, and didn't get the same out of the box usability of standard opensuse, but also lacked the configurability of a bare-metal debian. With fedora, another distribution supposedly aimed at the desktop, i felt all very 1999, without grandmothering, but also without the immediate usability.

    The bug turned out to be a pci-express thing of course, but it did show me that maybe opensuse wasn't all that bad compared to the others.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Not to kick openSuSE lovers in the jewels, but what makes openSuSE so much different/better than Ubuntu, Debian or Fedora?

    SuSE was my first distro, but that's the only reason I've ever used it.
    Biggest reason by far is YaST. Quite simply it has a feature set that I have yet to see matched in any other distro. It also has by far the best refined implementation of KDE as well. With recent versions as well zypper meets or exceeds other package managers in pretty much every aspect including speed. There are also other nice little refinements such as not having to screw around with a bunch of command line just to get items like dmraid up and running (it is supported right from boot). There are bunch of other features but these are just a few items that make it stand out.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    519

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    Biggest reason by far is YaST. Quite simply it has a feature set that I have yet to see matched in any other distro. It also has by far the best refined implementation of KDE as well.
    This.

    About zypper it's definitely good, however I think apt-get sports a tad more features.

    All in all, I'd still recommend (a mono-free) Ubuntu to brand new Linux users, however if you want a stable, clean OS with a set of powerful tools, definitely check openSUSE out.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PsynoKhi0 View Post
    This.

    About zypper it's definitely good, however I think apt-get sports a tad more features.
    What feature does apt-get have that zypper doesn't presently have?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    848

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Not to kick openSuSE lovers in the jewels, but what makes openSuSE so much different/better than Ubuntu, Debian or Fedora?
    OpenSUSE doesn't fork something just because they don't like someone upstream.

    ref: glibc and cdrtools.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yogi_berra View Post
    OpenSUSE doesn't fork something just because they don't like someone upstream.

    ref: glibc and cdrtools.
    Actually openSUSE uses wodim by default, it does however still have cdrtools on the repo and allows the user to decide.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •