Page 3 of 19 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 182

Thread: Mono Developers Go Bye-Bye From Attachmate

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,024

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by movieman View Post
    Why would Microsoft want it to be a viable cross platform solution? They make money on Windows, not C# compilers.
    Actually, they make a shit load off of C# development tools (Visual Studio ain't free, you know.... well, the Express edition is, but it sucks compared to paid for versions), and Visual Studio w/ Mono is a great way to deploy .NET on a server platform that isn't crap.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    196

    Default

    Do you know of anyone who actually uses Mono ASP.NET? The whole thing just smells bad to me.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    460

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by elanthis View Post
    Actually, they make a shit load off of C# development tools (Visual Studio ain't free, you know.... well, the Express edition is, but it sucks compared to paid for versions), and Visual Studio w/ Mono is a great way to deploy .NET on a server platform that isn't crap.
    They make nothing on Visual Studio compared to what they make on Windows. Having everyone take their Windows apps and run them on another OS would be Microsoft's nightmare, not their dream.

    If Microsoft were supporting Mono, it's because they wanted to use it to undermine Linux, not because they want to sell Visual Studio to Linux developers.

    BTW, I was using the Express Edition for years and didn't notice any real problems with it. I haven't touched Windows development in a couple of years though.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by movieman View Post
    They make nothing on Visual Studio compared to what they make on Windows. Having everyone take their Windows apps and run them on another OS would be Microsoft's nightmare, not their dream.

    If Microsoft were supporting Mono, it's because they wanted to use it to undermine Linux, not because they want to sell Visual Studio to Linux developers.

    BTW, I was using the Express Edition for years and didn't notice any real problems with it. I haven't touched Windows development in a couple of years though.
    Almost none of the code you generate in Visual Studio runs on Mono. Mono implements the base libraries but none of the Systems.Windows.Forms libraries (well, legally). GTK# is a completely different beast. The only code you can realistically write in Visual Studio are console apps or dlls.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    72

    Default I can think of one thing

    Quote Originally Posted by wswartzendruber View Post
    Do you know of anyone who actually uses Mono ASP.NET? The whole thing just smells bad to me.
    not on ASP.NET but Mono. Unity Game engine runs on Mono and is doing quite well. Granted your games wont' run on Linux but it runs on Mac and Windows. With special licencing, it also runs on Android, iOS, Wii, PS3, XBox360. It also only supports .net languages like Jscript (ms javascript), C#, and Boo.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    845

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by movieman View Post
    If Microsoft were supporting Mono, it's because they wanted to use it to undermine Linux, not because they want to sell Visual Studio to Linux developers.
    Again, I think they accepted Mono because the cross platform ability it offered helped them compete against Java, and by not extending the 'community promise' to the Microsoft compability stack (windows forms, ado, asp) they would still be able to demand licencing for using those parts of .NET somewhere down the line should C#/.NET make it big on non-windows platforms.

    Quote Originally Posted by movieman View Post
    BTW, I was using the Express Edition for years and didn't notice any real problems with it. I haven't touched Windows development in a couple of years though.
    Well, maybe there's more things lacking in the express versions, but I know that they've crippled it as far as optimizations goes, Profile Guided optimization and Link Time optimization is not available in the express versions, same goes for openmp support.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    684

    Default

    What is with these idiotic mono-hating trolls everywhere? Its just pathetic.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Reading through other sources on the web, as I wanted to get a better overall picture...

    Attachmate is going to be re-focusing the SuSE Linux-related assets back to Nuremberg (Germany). That's where it will be HQ'ed.

    As a result of this change, a number of US-based employees will lose their jobs. This just happens to involve a number working on Mono. eg: Miguel de Icaza is based in Boston, Massachusetts.

    Its up to the management team at Nuremberg to decide if Mono is worth continuing under them. (Maybe Mono development continues in Europe?...I guess that would be good, as software patents are viewed very differently over there.)

    As for Mono itself, I don't develop cross-platform .Net apps, so I really have no comment on that solution.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,103

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XorEaxEax View Post
    Again, I think they accepted Mono because the cross platform ability it offered helped them compete against Java, and by not extending the 'community promise' to the Microsoft compability stack (windows forms, ado, asp) they would still be able to demand licencing for using those parts of .NET somewhere down the line should C#/.NET make it big on non-windows platforms.
    Yes, it was a marketing thing. At the time, a Java marketing point was that it was implemented everywhere, that you weren't tied to a specific company, and that you could write software once and have it work everywhere else. MS didn't want to support a Linux port themselves, but they were happy to allow others to partially support it as it let them tick the checkbox for marketing while still allowing them to claim that you should buy Windows for best results. The same thing happened with Silverlight/Moonlight. Flash's big advantage was that it was installed everywhere, and people were worried about being locked into just Windows - or even just IE. Moonlight allowed MS to argue that Silverlight could be run anywhere Flash could, and simultaneously they could make sure their own implementation integrated best into Windows and IE.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    437

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bwat47 View Post
    What is with these idiotic mono-hating trolls everywhere? Its just pathetic.
    I won't be empathizing you when you get your ass sued to a pile of mishmash by Microsoft when you created your entire business based on Mono. Mono is evil, just get over it. No matter how hard you try, it is still based on a corporation that tries to kill you all the time.

    Lay off all Mono devs, lol good! I like it! Now you mono devs can kiss your ass good bye for 'doing the wrong thing'.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •