Reply With QuoteThe graphics is not always ugly. Sometimes AF may not necessarily improve visual quality, but it may cost quite a lot of performance. Only apps should determine when it *can* be used, not users.
Banned
sure?? normal users just don't care...Originally Posted by marek
AF just should be activated by default.
if someone want ugly graphic he can turn it of by hand.
X.Org Developer
The graphics is not always ugly. Sometimes AF may not necessarily improve visual quality, but it may cost quite a lot of performance. Only apps should determine when it *can* be used, not users.
Banned
sure,,, but your point does not make an control panel a must have.-
Phoronix Member
Guess my sarcasm was rather subtle
I'm just saying that r300 generation was first left in the dust by Catalyst,
so that it could be left in the dust by xf86-video-ati afterwards. But r300
r600 split was not a surprise for me, because i expected it. Call it a hunch.
Phoronix Member
Or not.
The wording of the article made me believe that a feature
was added to R600g that somehow wasn't available on R300g.
My bad
Senior Member
Someone should update http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature
Senior Member
BTW this is available in my Ubuntu PPA.
