Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Just Announced: Qt 5 To Be Released Next Year

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,126

    Default Just Announced: Qt 5 To Be Released Next Year

    Phoronix: Just Announced: Qt 5 To Be Released Next Year

    Just announced during the Ubuntu Developer Summit in Budapest is word that Qt 5 is in development and will be released in the next calendar year...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=OTQyMA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    536

    Default

    Also, lots of talk about Wayland and OpenGL (ES) 2.0.

    Link to Qt Labs: http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2011/05/09/...ts-about-qt-5/

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    416

    Default

    The article says that Qt5 will be modularized, but it already is. Does it mean it will be more modularized?

    Qt4 already has components like QtCore, QtGUI, QtXML, QtNetwork, Phonon, etc.

    Hopefully more details come out soon.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Nokia has also just announced that they will be moving Qt towards a matter of open governance for the open-source project.
    Looks like I will be declaring Gnome dead soon. Any defender will just be a hypocrite

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,174

    Default Couple of key quotes

    For those of you that were with us for the transition of Qt 3 to Qt 4, we do not plan to repeat that difficult transition with Qt 5. To be explicit here we believe we can keep source compatibility for the majority of cases, but we believe that breaking binary compatibility is needed.
    That's very good.

    Qt will require OpenGL (ES) 2.0 to work.
    That's interesting. KDE has long marketed their solution as superior because it could automatically fall back to a non-composited environment and work fine, unlike Gnome3. Also, Ubuntu was just talking about how their Qt based Unity2D desktop was going to assume no hardware acceleration at all times. I can see how this might piss some people off, although i trust it was done for a good reason (better acceleration for most people).

    We should expect that over time all UIs will be written in QML. JavaScript will become a first class citizen within the Qt community and we should expect that a lot of application logic and even entire applications will be written in JavaScript instead of C++. The expectation is that many application developers will actually start out with QML and JavaScript and only implement functionality in C++ when required.
    And this is really interesting. It sounds like they are really moving away from the C++ model of development with Qt5, and on to the new WPF - oops, i mean Qt Quick - development.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    772

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pvtcupcakes View Post
    The article says that Qt5 will be modularized, but it already is. Does it mean it will be more modularized?

    Qt4 already has components like QtCore, QtGUI, QtXML, QtNetwork, Phonon, etc.
    It physically has modules for various peripheral functionality, but the toolkit itself is still pretty monolithic. Some people might have a problem with a "Hello world" app pulling in a .so that weighs about 11MB (on x86-64 anyway; probably a little bit smaller on architectures like x86 or ARM that would actually be used in a more memory-constrained application).

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,146

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Looks like I will be declaring Gnome dead soon. Any defender will just be a hypocrite
    Gnome doesn't even compete with Qt, so please go ahead and do that. Lots of lulz that way lie.

    As for Qt, the QML+Js direction is quite interesting. I just hope they can improve their language bindings (gobject introspection ftw!)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    Gnome doesn't even compete with Qt, so please go ahead and do that. Lots of lulz that way lie.
    Gnome was created to compete with KDE for the very reason that Qt was not 100% free software. If Qt was free software by then, Gnome wouldn't even exist.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •