Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 122

Thread: AMD's Hiring Open-Source Graphics Developers Still

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Veerappan View Post
    The mythical year of the Linux Desktop?

    I have a feeling that both AMD and Intel are doing it for the same reasons.

    Google just get ready for an Multi-Billion-Dollar-$$$$$ Invasion on the Market to hurt Micro$oft for an final beating dead.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by devius View Post
    Intel and AMD hiring lots of developers to work on open source projects... what the hell is going on? Is there something big coming that we don't know about?
    Microsoft is porting Windows to ARM and expect SOCs running Windows 8 in a short while. This means that:
    -Intel is not friend with MS anymore, also because of Meamo;
    -Microsoft is pressured because there are so many Linux devices nowadays that AMD and Intel are starting to see that it's a new Silicon Valley aera.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,375

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Qaridarium View Post
    they only set this bit because they do not found any in local area.
    AMD has never really had a formal requirement that our open source developers be based out of an office. I've worked remotely for years now. Some people prefer an office, others prefer remote work. I only mentioned it because it was somewhat unclear from the job post.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by agd5f View Post
    AMD has never really had a formal requirement that our open source developers be based out of an office. I've worked remotely for years now. Some people prefer an office, others prefer remote work. I only mentioned it because it was somewhat unclear from the job post.
    fine on that way your team will find a helping hand.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Microsoft is porting Windows to ARM and expect SOCs running Windows 8 in a short while. This means that:
    -Intel is not friend with MS anymore, also because of Meamo;
    -Microsoft is pressured because there are so many Linux devices nowadays that AMD and Intel are starting to see that it's a new Silicon Valley aera.
    "Intel is not friend with MS anymore"

    you get it ;-) and the best part is... google ask intel : "intel why are you so crappy on linux thats force us to use ARM..."

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    153

    Default

    For those wondering about Marek, Tom, and I: Tom and I are still in school. I don't know about Marek but I seem to remember he is also a student.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,688

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MostAwesomeDude View Post
    For those wondering about Marek, Tom, and I: Tom and I are still in school. I don't know about Marek but I seem to remember he is also a student.
    school can wait

    users demanding FOSS drivers cannot

    quit NOW

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    153

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 89c51 View Post
    school can wait

    users demanding FOSS drivers cannot

    quit NOW
    I currently work for OSUOSL, so I am not exactly inactive in the community. I also write lots of free-time things; examine Bravo, Darklight, Lye, etc. from my personal stash for some examples.

    Oh, and don't encourage students to drop out; it sends the wrong message, namely "I am a twit who cannot understand why people sometimes want to pursue long-term personal improvement over short-term monetary gain."

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,688

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MostAwesomeDude View Post
    Oh, and don't encourage students to drop out; it sends the wrong message, namely "I am a twit who cannot understand why people sometimes want to pursue long-term personal improvement over short-term monetary gain."
    it was a joke

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Can anyone please explain this to me?
    Why would AMD want to pay people to develop two separate drivers?

    If they don't want their driver open-source why invest in it at all and not tell people to use Catalyst?

    If the do want to have an awesome open source driver why not just release the code of Catalyst and have one driver to maintain?

    Isn't it just not profitable for them to develop 2 pieces of software to accomplish the same task?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •