Page 5 of 13 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 122

Thread: AMD's Hiring Open-Source Graphics Developers Still

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,128

    Default

    Oh yeah. Why would anyone want to use Gallium3d on Microsoft Vistaware?
    There was a very good reason to port linux drivers to windows with the Voodoo 3 (I think it was that card). No official support anymore, and they were more stable and faster

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    There was a very good reason to port linux drivers to windows with the Voodoo 3 (I think it was that card). No official support anymore, and they were more stable and faster
    People even made a Doom3 hack for these cards. Even a Windows 98 cracked executable. I don't understand that with the availability of $25 cards and a Linux port. Must have been diehard fanboys?

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    405

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    People even made a Doom3 hack for these cards. Even a Windows 98 cracked executable. I don't understand that with the availability of $25 cards and a Linux port. Must have been diehard fanboys?
    Or wards of the state.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DaemonFC View Post
    Oh yeah. Why would anyone want to use Gallium3d on Microsoft Vistaware? The entire system is a black box that treats the user like a criminal. Telling a Windows user that AMD Catalyst is crap and not to be trusted would be like telling an AIDS patient they need to worry about dandruff.
    LOOOOOOOOL... (no not like a criminal because using windows is a criminal)

  5. #45
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    -Intel is not friend with MS anymore, also because of Meamo;
    Well truth be known that MS has never been a real "friend" with intel. You just have to take a look at what 64-bit standard they chose, or how intel forced MS to drop the system requirements to have their products "Vista Capable" to see that (both items that really pissed off intel at the time).

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Just got nvidia gtx 260 sp 216 / 1792mb of g'ram.
    Your opendrivers are weak, your closed source drivers are weak, your marketing is strong. Rock on AMD.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,929

    Default

    It really depends on what you're using it for.

    I have a GTX 460 at work with binary drivers, and an HD4550 with open drivers at home. For regular desktop usage, AMD wins hands down. 2d is faster, desktop effects are smoother. That's quite impressive considering the difference between the cards.

    For gaming and hi-performance 3d, there's obviously no comparison. The AMD open drivers work perfectly, but are slow.

    A lot of this nvidia fanboyism is based on 4-year old experiences and perpetuated myths.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    It really depends on what you're using it for.

    I have a GTX 460 at work with binary drivers, and an HD4550 with open drivers at home. For regular desktop usage, AMD wins hands down. 2d is faster, desktop effects are smoother. That's quite impressive considering the difference between the cards.

    For gaming and hi-performance 3d, there's obviously no comparison. The AMD open drivers work perfectly, but are slow.

    A lot of this nvidia fanboyism is based on 4-year old experiences and perpetuated myths.
    Faster 2d and kms root-less xorg is the only positive thing about R700 opensource.

    What do you use your home machine for? Videoaccel - absent, 3d - slow and unstable, no hope for advanced features that are in catalyst - opensource is destined to low-end. Well, gtx 260 and 460 are not low-end cards.

    Everywhere else nvidia wins hands down. Because their drivers is not programmed by bunch of semi-external developers and army of students, but paid inhouse developers. You buy card and they do drivers - same as on windows that amd actively polishes for free.

    2 year 9800, 1 year 4770 and now back to 260 gtx. Desktop effects are smoother than on 4770, if you throw some options into xorg.conf.d

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,929

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycheese View Post
    What do you use your home machine for?
    Internet, music, watching movies, programming, occasional casual gaming.

    The OSS drivers are great for all but the last one, where they are OK.

    Hardware acceleration for 1080 would be nice, I agree, but my machine has no problem doing it on the CPU, so it's not a big deal.

    Now that the drivers are not bleeding-edge-experimental anymore, I find them easier to upgrade too. Getting the Nvidia drivers installed on Debian was quite painful, and I couldn't boot half of the time.

    There is no argument when it comes to pure 3d performance, but when OK 3d performance is good enough, the AMD OSS drivers are better, hands down. Plus look at the cool stuff that's coming relatively soon: OpenGL 3, Hyper-Z, video decoding. And it's all open.

    If people are willing to use a huge black box for added performance, it's up to them, but I don't agree with the meme that the AMD OSS drivers are not good. They are very much excellent, but unoptimised.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,929

    Default

    I also don't know what you find unstable about the drivers. This will also depend on your hardware, but I get as many crashes with the nvidia binary as I do with the AMD OSS drivers -- that is: very few.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •