Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: Open-Source AMD Fusion Driver Stabilizes

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,914

    Default Open-Source AMD Fusion Driver Stabilizes

    Phoronix: Open-Source AMD Fusion Driver Stabilizes

    With the very latest open-source Linux driver code for the AMD Fusion E-350, the support is finally stable and comparable to that of other recent Radeon HD graphics processors with the open-source driver stack.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=16018

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1

    Default Flash

    I'm really interested in getting one of these to run as an HTPC. Was wondering what the flash player performance in linux was like, both with/without the catalyst driver?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,150

    Default

    If you're going to use Flash, use pre-release versions of Flash 11.0 (or 10.4 if that is actually going to happen before). The performance is okay when using the Catalyst driver (haven't checked with latest radeon code), but it will only really shine when VA-API is supported by Flash soon.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    319

    Default

    *yawn*, Michael's research goes so well, F15 GA has stable fusion fix in it.

    So at least Fedora users won't be waiting for F16. You really need to learn how to research something instead of writing unfounded unresearched articles.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by narcolepsy View Post
    I'm really interested in getting one of these to run as an HTPC. Was wondering what the flash player performance in linux was like, both with/without the catalyst driver?
    right now the catalyst 11-5 beat the radeon... in flash usage..

    in the future flash will use the uvd unit... on the catalyst side and shader acceleration on the radeon side.

    the real difference here are the power consuming.

  6. #6

    Default

    to translate a bit of Fedora jargon, 'GA' = General Availability = final release; Fedora 15's release kernel has the relevant Fusion fixes in it, so Fusion systems should work great with F15 out of the box. Michael, it'd good if you could update the article. thanks!

    (In general, Fedora kernels get quite a lot of graphics backports, particularly for Radeon and Nouveau, so you can't rely simply on the headline version number to determine the status of graphics support in Fedora kernels, you'll have to test them or check out the changelog and patch list).

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    519

    Default Intended usage scenarios

    Honestly, I doubt game benchmarks at 1080p are that relevant on the Brazos platform.
    Video playback, sure! But games? IMO a 12" netbook's native resolution is more than enough. "Good enough FPS" in the mid-term is a fair trade-off for an on-going driver development work.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    154

    Default

    To John/Alex/David - Is it likely that more performance can be squeezed out of the open-source Fusion graphics driver in the future (other than the wider potential performance gains in the r600g driver which have already been discussed in these forums)?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,634

    Default

    Best is to test it yourself. You can squeeze out certainly higher fps than you read on this website when you don't use the defaults but set swapbufferswait to 0. I doubt it will be a gaming solution then, but for same games which have been just a tiny bit too slow it could work. The cpu is faster than atom, so maybe even 720p with software decoding should do. But don't expect high speed...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    Best is to test it yourself. You can squeeze out certainly higher fps than you read on this website when you don't use the defaults but set swapbufferswait to 0. I doubt it will be a gaming solution then, but for same games which have been just a tiny bit too slow it could work. The cpu is faster than atom, so maybe even 720p with software decoding should do. But don't expect high speed...
    in other words we really need a "tear-free-desktop-buffering-cache architecture" like the catalyst one.. to speed up the stuff.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •