Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33

Thread: Open-Source AMD Fusion Driver Stabilizes

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,402

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by madbiologist View Post
    To John/Alex/David - Is it likely that more performance can be squeezed out of the open-source Fusion graphics driver in the future (other than the wider potential performance gains in the r600g driver which have already been discussed in these forums)?
    Fusion is no different than any of the other radeon asics. There are a number of improvements that need to happen in the 3D driver to get closer to fglrx. The usual suspects:
    - improving the state tracking/emit in r600g
    - improving the shader compiler
    - enabling 2D tiling
    - enabling HiZ
    - enabling fast clears
    etc.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,278

    Default

    @agd5f

    I think he meant in general - even the fglrx framerates are rather low. Is the hardware (zacate) capable of more?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    984

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Qaridarium View Post
    in other words we really need a "tear-free-desktop-buffering-cache architecture" like the catalyst one.. to speed up the stuff.
    How does catalyst implement tear-free desktop without vsyncing?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,149

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    I doubt it will be a gaming solution then, but for same games which have been just a tiny bit too slow it could work.
    On Windows, the E-350 can run things like Portal 2 with anti-aliasing enabled. It's nota gaming solution but it's not bad either.

    The cpu is faster than atom, so maybe even 720p with software decoding should do. But don't expect high speed...
    720p runs fine on software decoding here. Of course, hardware decoding is much better from a power consumption and multitasking standpoint but 720p works without issue even on flashplayer. (1080p is another matter and does require hardware to work correctly).

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,149

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by darkbasic View Post
    How does catalyst implement tear-free desktop without vsyncing?
    AFAIK, it uses vsync with triple buffering to improve performance.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by darkbasic View Post
    How does catalyst implement tear-free desktop without vsyncing?
    this feature gives you more performance like disabling vsync

    but yes this only matters if the fps cound is lower than 60fps.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    154

    Default

    Two weeks ago while I was back in Europe, I then received a response to one of my bug reports from March regarding an E-350 TTM crash. In this bug report response, AMD's Alex Deucher cites a patch that was recently merged into Linus Torvald's kernel tree from one of the DRM bug-fix pulls late into the Linux 2.6.39 kernel cycle. The patch in question is drm/radeon/kms: fix gart setup on fusion parts (v2) with a description of "Out of the entire GART/VM subsystem, the hw designers changed the location of 3 regs. v2: airlied: add parameter for userspace to work from."
    This patch is also in the 2.6.38.7 kernel, so it will probably come to Ubuntu 11.04 in the near to medium future.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    392

    Default Waking up an old thread!

    For guys out there running E350's I have a couple of questions for you.

    1. At this time how has performance stabilized with Linux? Or in other words are birthing pains over in general running Ubuntu or Fedora.
    2. How about the GPU specifically? I know it was a problem initially but have the drivers settled down? Have they gotten faster?

    Thanks

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,149

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wizard69 View Post
    For guys out there running E350's I have a couple of questions for you.

    1. At this time how has performance stabilized with Linux? Or in other words are birthing pains over in general running Ubuntu or Fedora.
    2. How about the GPU specifically? I know it was a problem initially but have the drivers settled down? Have they gotten faster?

    Thanks
    The open-source driver offers pretty good 2d on Gnome Shell (Unity is quite a bit slower). Haven't tested KWin for some time, but it was generally ok back in July (somewhere between Gnome Shell and Unity in performance). Suspend/resume works fine, 3d works (GL2.1 but I'm not gaming on this system). No video acceleration out of the box. No power management.

    Fglrx 11.10 still doesn't work with Gnome Shell (visible corruption). It works with Unity and is quite fast if you disable vsync in compiz (tearfree in amdcccle is enough). Performance in KDE is ok (not good, just ok). 3d works (GL4.1) but suspend/resume doesn't. No video acceleration out of the box. Good power management.

    You can watch 720p video fine in VLC. Flash, however, is too slow - neither 10.3 nor 11.0 can play fullscreen video smoothly, *regardless* of the resolution, and everything above 360p stutters.

    One surprising thing about this APU is how well it runs virtual machines.

    All things considered, Windows is around an order of magnitude smoother on this APU if you can live with its other shortcomings: faster 2d, faster 3d, smooth 1080p (both offline and flash), lower power consumption (expect around 30-40% more battery life), correct suspend/resume. The experience is much better overall.

    I don't think I can recommend E-series APUs for Linux. Unlike Windows, Linux performance is much more dependent on CPU power (so Atoms are out of the question, too), so a i3 or A6 will offer a much better experience.

    My 2cc.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,278

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wizard69 View Post
    For guys out there running E350's I have a couple of questions for you.

    1. At this time how has performance stabilized with Linux? Or in other words are birthing pains over in general running Ubuntu or Fedora.
    2. How about the GPU specifically? I know it was a problem initially but have the drivers settled down? Have they gotten faster?

    Thanks
    Mine still runs the stack originally set up on it, ie linux 3.0, git -ati, git mesa (with mesa periodically updated of these). It worked OK then and still works ok.

    Everything works that I try to do on it, be it compiling, VMs or 3d. It still has the DPMS flicker bug as far as I can tell (the bug is still open; I haven't tested newer kernels), but it's stable. It was also surprisingly fast, I expected worse from that cpu.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •