+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Is ATI now a better bet?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    4

    Default Is ATI now a better bet?

    I'm searching for a new laptop to run Linux and XP. This may actually be a good time to do it, as AMD's turnaround might make ATI graphics the better choice. Should I bank on this, or stick with NVidia for their track record?

  2. #2

    Default

    Well, it really comes down to if you're in it for the long haul or not... Right now there are still a number of people running into issues with the 8.41 driver, but those should be corrected in 8.42 and 8.43. AMD is also funding the development of the open-source driver but that will not happen overnight but will take several months.

    NVIDIA on the other hand as their binary driver that has basically remained the same over the past year or so and then there are the Nouveau folks reverse engineering the binary blob.

    What specifically are you looking to do with this laptop?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    4

    Default

    This laptop is replacing my older one, which broke and was sent back to be replaced under warranty (which ebuyer took to mean "refund" and i can get something better now ). I'm not expecting to run Half-Life 2 on it (even though I'm going to try) but I do want some 3D performance for Compiz and some older games. The laptop I've got my eyes on now has the same graphics chipset (Xpress 200M) so I have an idea of its performance. Also, I'm more familiar with ATI under Linux than I am NVidia.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    One day I'll reach Alaska, or die trying!
    Posts
    217

    Default

    Don't waste your time, stick with NVIDIA.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    PL
    Posts
    900

    Default

    it you can wait a while - go for ati.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1c3d0g View Post
    Don't waste your time, stick with NVIDIA.
    ...and have the GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap out-of-memory bug haunting you[1], among other things.

    no one is perfect. I would go with AMD/ATI though. In the long run, it should be a better deal.


    [1] the new driver addresses it, but doesn't really fix it.
    Last edited by ioannis; 09-30-2007 at 02:23 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    612

    Default

    Why not wait and see what shakes out of the ATI/AMD tree. If the fruit seems rotten, then just stick with nVidia.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,593

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeepDayze View Post
    Why not wait and see what shakes out of the ATI/AMD tree. If the fruit seems rotten, then just stick with nVidia.
    Nicely said.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    5,495

    Default

    Well the problem with the future is that is is not really predictable... If you need it NOW then you should get definitely Nvidia otherwise you come back every month and blame the fglrx driver because of it's new faults
    Last edited by Kano; 10-01-2007 at 07:03 AM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    PL
    Posts
    900

    Default

    or you would come back every week moaning about slow progress of radeonhd (which i cannot blame anybody for - it cannot be done any faster)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts