Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: Say Hello To Linux 3.0; Linus Just Tagged 3.0-rc1

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    945

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kraftman View Post
    The final 3.0.0 will be just 3.0 and future releases will be 3.1, 3.x. Afaik they just have to fix some scripts.
    And the stable versions point releases will obviously be 3.x.x, so only three numbers instead of the current four. It will probably be easier to remember. Nice.

    PS: Linus has an Atom netbook? That has to be the highlight of this article.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    56

    Default

    Oh cool! Finally Linux kernel will be on-par with MINIX. MINIX has been on version 3 forever.

    (sorry I just had to strike some joke on this one )

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    989

    Default

    Somebody give Linus a top-of-the-line ThinkPad "T" series to lug around. Some pretty serious iron in a reasonably small package there. The head honcho has no business building the kernel on an Atom.

    Other than that: I don't care about the versioning, but I do care that Linus' main goal in a kernel release is to make work easy for him. Small patches, no features, critical fixes, trivial merges. He likes that, but it does very little for us. It means that the kernel is getting stagnant, and the mindset for change and evolution is being stamped out.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    956

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by allquixotic View Post
    Somebody give Linus a top-of-the-line ThinkPad "T" series to lug around. Some pretty serious iron in a reasonably small package there. The head honcho has no business building the kernel on an Atom.

    Other than that: I don't care about the versioning, but I do care that Linus' main goal in a kernel release is to make work easy for him. Small patches, no features, critical fixes, trivial merges. He likes that, but it does very little for us. It means that the kernel is getting stagnant, and the mindset for change and evolution is being stamped out.
    A T60 or T61 would do nicely as these machines sport dual-core Intel CPU's

    If people follow his patch submission process things would been a LOT better and *major* changes could still be submitted for consideration. A good tip is to provide clear documentation on what a particular patch does or what bugs it fixes. Linus HATES patch submissions that are vague that's for sure. Major patches should be perhaps discussed first then if Linus gives his blessing it could be included

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    120

    Default

    I think it's great he builds kernels on an ATOM. I built 3.0-rc1 on AMD K125 (single core) equipped netbook today and it's not too bad. 10 minutes or so.

    By the way, 3.0-rc1 with drm/mesa/xf86-video-ati from git is boringly stable so far on my netbook. You'd think I'd see some sort of spectacular regression...

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    956

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amphigory View Post
    I think it's great he builds kernels on an ATOM. I built 3.0-rc1 on AMD K125 (single core) equipped netbook today and it's not too bad. 10 minutes or so.

    By the way, 3.0-rc1 with drm/mesa/xf86-video-ati from git is boringly stable so far on my netbook. You'd think I'd see some sort of spectacular regression...
    Guess its because Atoms are pretty much the lowest common denominator these days. Running Linux smoothly on a netbook is the aim most likely

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    379

    Default Ohhh noooo....

    I have to update all my braindumps

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •