Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32

Thread: How Unity, Compiz, GNOME Shell & KWin Affect Performance

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    59

    Thumbs down

    These results just can't be right. Uncomposited Metacity is the slowest one? It's ridiculous.



    Mutter and Metacity comes from GNOME 3.0.2, KWin form KDE SC 4.6.80.

    Hardware: C2D E4500, GTX 275 / 270.41.19

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    401

    Default

    My nVidia GeForce GTX260 is doing very very fine on KDE 4.6.x. If I would need to, I could switch to LXDE, and remain cool.

    Nice test, BTW!!!

  3. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by torturedutopian View Post
    You didn't mention, in the test, the use of the Compiz or KWin options that disable compositing for fullscreen apps, thus games !

    * By default, KWin turns off compositing for fullscreen apps and should be as fast as Metacity (don't know why it turns out to be faster ?!). This option is great but makes the screen flicker a little when switching from windowed to fullscreen mode. In the future, there will be an API, apparently, so that apps can tell if they are more demanding or not, and if compositing should be switched off or not. (way to go, IMHO !)
    Exactly. This is very valuable comment in this thread.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    145

    Default My Gnome Shell is working just fine - for me

    I am not a gamer. My comment is more for a normal desktop user.

    I installed Kubuntu, then added the Gnome3 PPA. I added just the Gnome3 stuff and avoided all the legacy stuff from a standard Ubuntu install. I reconfigured the login to GDM and now have a stable Gnome Shell desktop - with KDE in reserve.

    I had to remove the fglrx drivers as they were unusable. The screen was corrupted constantly. I installed a 2.6.39 kernel and xorg-edgers and am now running Mesa/Gallium3D.

    All animations are smooth. Xvid videos play full screen smoothly. Flash via YouTube plays smoothly. I have WebGL running in Chrome and the demos run smoothly. I had to use the --disable-gpu-blacklist flag in Chrome.

    My family have all had issues with Unity. One of the worst is the launcher being stuck on the screen and overlaying running apps. With Gnome Shell there has not been any issues of that nature. I need KDE installed as well. The new Nautilus cannot handle Samba shares, but by using Dolphin under Gnome it all works nicely. All the KDE networking stuff is installed and usable. My media players happily read my shared folders.

    So, while all the above benchmarks point to gaming being near to impossible under Gnome Shell, I have no problems with web browsing, video, word processing etc. And my desktop and desktop effects are rock solid.

    And I do agree with an earlier post that suggested trying the benchmarks with Fedora 15. It will be interesting to see what happens in a dedicated Gnome Shell distro. Using the Gnome3 PPA under Ubuntu is a recipe for dependency hell. Using it with Kubuntu is, so far, a better option for me.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Santiago, Chile
    Posts
    263

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gedgon View Post
    These results just can't be right. Uncomposited Metacity is the slowest one? It's ridiculous.



    Mutter and Metacity comes from GNOME 3.0.2, KWin form KDE SC 4.6.80.

    Hardware: C2D E4500, GTX 275 / 270.41.19
    Theoretically, composited may be faster than uncomposited (display from VRAM vs display using CPU; more CPU used by WM = less performance). The strangest thing is: why KWin on NVIDIA gives such a beating to anything else. The explanation definitely isn't some NVIDIA blob bug; Nouveau exhibits the same behaviour.

    TFA uses KDE SC 4.6.2, not KDE SC 4.6.80.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    840

    Default

    Why Benchmark Gnome-shell and not Mutter specifically?????

    Mutter is a compositor, Kwin is a compositor and Compiz is a compositor (i don't need to mention Unity, because it is based on Compiz, of course).

    at the end of the article it is mentioned that gnome-shell is a mess right now (agreed), but wouldn't it have been more appropriate to test Mutter itself, to see how it performs against other compositors???

    gnome-shell could be the cause of performance loss, or mutter could be...or even clutter might be causing the crappy performance.

    from my perspective it''s almost pointless to benchmark 2 somewhat dis-similar things (gnome-shell vs. compiz or kwin?!?! - ie: gnome-shell is a DE not a compositor).

    it would be interesting to see actual current mutter benchmarks vs. compiz/kwin.

    cheerz

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,145

    Default

    So... to paraphrase.... GNOME 3 is a murderer of puppies. Got it.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grege View Post
    I am not a gamer. My comment is more for a normal desktop user.

    I installed Kubuntu, then added the Gnome3 PPA. I added just the Gnome3 stuff and avoided all the legacy stuff from a standard Ubuntu install. I reconfigured the login to GDM and now have a stable Gnome Shell desktop - with KDE in reserve.

    I had to remove the fglrx drivers as they were unusable. The screen was corrupted constantly. I installed a 2.6.39 kernel and xorg-edgers and am now running Mesa/Gallium3D.

    All animations are smooth. Xvid videos play full screen smoothly. Flash via YouTube plays smoothly. I have WebGL running in Chrome and the demos run smoothly. I had to use the --disable-gpu-blacklist flag in Chrome.

    My family have all had issues with Unity. One of the worst is the launcher being stuck on the screen and overlaying running apps. With Gnome Shell there has not been any issues of that nature. I need KDE installed as well. The new Nautilus cannot handle Samba shares, but by using Dolphin under Gnome it all works nicely. All the KDE networking stuff is installed and usable. My media players happily read my shared folders.

    So, while all the above benchmarks point to gaming being near to impossible under Gnome Shell, I have no problems with web browsing, video, word processing etc. And my desktop and desktop effects are rock solid.

    And I do agree with an earlier post that suggested trying the benchmarks with Fedora 15. It will be interesting to see what happens in a dedicated Gnome Shell distro. Using the Gnome3 PPA under Ubuntu is a recipe for dependency hell. Using it with Kubuntu is, so far, a better option for me.
    Why are you running Ubuntu at all? Fedora delivers a great KDE and GS experience without any hassle for most.
    I'm not trying to be argumentative just curious.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    145

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by liam View Post
    Why are you running Ubuntu at all? Fedora delivers a great KDE and GS experience without any hassle for most.
    I'm not trying to be argumentative just curious.
    Probably because i have been using Debian based distros for more than ten years - a merry go round of Debian testing and sid, Aptosid, Mint, LMDE, Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu. I am comfortable with every corner of the ecosystem. I tried SUSE and did not care for it. I have had Fedora running a few times, no problems but I always stick with what I know fairly well.

    Since I wrote that post I have added an Nvidia G210 and loaded the Nvidia drivers. I have added several extensions from GitHub, and even modified them for my own preferences. I now have an Applications menu back on the top tool bar, a weather app and quick launch icons. I have a bottom toolbar with a task switcher and a desktop pager. I can shut down without pressing ALT. Extensions make Gnome-shell infinitely configurable and extendible. My desktop looks like Gnome 2.x, but it is pure Gnome3 and Gnome-shell. The only thing missing is the simple Samba folder sharing that Ubuntu usually supplies via Nautilus-Share. The Gnome3 version of nautilus no longer supports nautilus-share. But because I built on Kubuntu, Dolphin and the KDE sharing programs are all there to use as replacements.

    Tip for anyone interested. If you find an extension you want, but it is packaged for another distro do not despair. Extensions are just javascript and kept in /usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions so download the source code version and just copy them in. Or open the rpm or deb with an archive manager and extract to the extension folder. Once you have done one it becomes simple. Restart the Shell and they are active.

    The desktop is fun again.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2

    Default

    please make another benchmark because gnome-shell and unity are more mature

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •