A Little How-to to Bridgman's Psychology
1) he is not a Liar
2) he can not an he do not tell us future AMD stuff because of NDA
3) he tells you if something is totally absurd and wrong and FUD
OK now we go to Practice a little analytic work :
I postulate stuff like "amd is open-sourcing the firmware" and my Psychology is other way around i don't care about i'm right or i'm Wong i just watch the peoples reaction and then i know the trueness.
watch the reaction of about the firmware stuff bridgman: "How is that ironic ? We have never discussed opening the microcode images and have no plans to do so. The microcode is part of the hardware design. Some hardware products have microcode images built into the chips, others require microcode images to be loaded at power-up, and some (including a number of CPUs) use a combination of built-in initial code plus driver-loaded patches. None of it is open. "
means no AMD will not Opensource the firmware.
But watch the reaction of Bridgman of the claim with the HD2900 shader based ATI Avivo Viedeo decoder: Bridgman : ......... ............ ........... .........
Uhhh Wait.... What?,,,, Bridgman can't tell us nothing!...
because he hurt his NDA if he talk about that stuff.
Means i do a Negative proof by brute-forcing the wrong opportunities against Bridgman's Psychobiology !!
Hey Thats cool