Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Intel Sandy Bridge Performance Goes Up Again

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,787

    Default Intel Sandy Bridge Performance Goes Up Again

    Phoronix: Intel Sandy Bridge Performance Goes Up Again

    At the beginning of the month I reported on a small patch to Mesa that resulted in a huge performance improvement for Intel Sandy Bridge graphics, but Intel's OSTC developers have bumped up the performance of the latest-generation graphics processors even more. With the LLC caching patch-set, which should be committed to the Linux 2.6.40 kernel (not the current 2.6.39 cycle), there are measurable OpenGL performance improvements.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=15863

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Russe, Bulgaria
    Posts
    511

    Default

    I am sorry AMD. I am fan of yours, but Llano is too late now. When all problems resolve and motherboards become mainstream it will be end of the year already. I will get one of those i3-2100, since I am not much of a gamer, but open video acceleration is much of importance for me.
    I wish Intel, keep the good work with all open source projects, and keep evolving Mesa

    I am still a fanboy, but not at all cost

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    683

    Default

    I'm also cheering Intel. They may be the ones who bring OpenGL 3 to X land. And restart-free graphic switching, and, and, and.

    Unfortunately Intel seam to adopt OpenGL 4.1 really slowly

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    577

    Default

    There is nothing stopping Ubuntu or any other distro from backporting these changes into what ever kernel they decide to ship

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    This looks extremely sexy.
    Im looking at selling my AMD rig and puchasing 2,5k.
    Opencore is not opensource, proprietary with always half-arsed opensource strategy is not opensource really.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,102

    Default

    I'm simultaniously happy about this and sad about the older intel gfx still sucking horribly. Is something like this not possible for them too?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts
    105

    Default Finally

    Good. I was getting tired of all that AMD openness crap. "Yes, we're open. We're vevy vevy open." Yes, you are, dear. You are wide open.

    How come xf86-video-ati devs can't do some reverse engineering akin to nouveau? How come Fusion/Zacate don't have open source video acceleration much alike SandyBridge. Hell, even Broadcom managed to push open source acceleration code for their Crystal family. SRSLY, Whats wrong with you, guys?

    There. Now my steam pressure level is... lets say... tollerable.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    226

    Default

    Eyeballing the older Windows VS Ubuntu thread:
    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...winbuntu&num=1

    It seems that the Linux driver is on par with and sometimes exceeding the Windows driver!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,302

    Default

    i'm an amd fan and i would have to agree with everyone here that amd is just taking way too long. but, keep in mind even their windows drivers are bad. if they can't get their main audience some decent drivers when they release a product, they're not going to do it for linux either. until linux gets attention when products are released, i don't care about using anything new or fancy in it. the nice thing about linux is it's a lot more hardware efficient than windows, but, it takes longer for it to get there. if you don't have anything too demanding, just go with the newest compatible hardware.

    i'm very happy to see intel putting in this much effort, and i didn't bother to check if Tgui was right but if so, its nice to know linux has competitive graphics performance.

    considering all the kernel updates lately, i feel like linux should outperform windows in just about every test at this point, as long as we don't use amd or nvidia for the graphics tests. i'm aware ubuntu is considered the default distro due to the most popularity but i really wish phoronix would do separate tests on an optimized distro like gentoo or arch. ubuntu packs in so much unnecessary stuff.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    328

    Default

    Please Michael show more graphics hardware benchmarks as a reference, ati or nvidia (preferably both), this way would be easy to see how the performance of SB compares to different hardware / driver.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •