Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 45 of 45

Thread: The "Dirndl" On AMD Opterons Are Impressive

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    845

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    In some cases it also leads to slower performance.
    True, I noticed this when doing some Mame benchmarks here on the Phoronix forums, someone told me that -O2 often beat -O3, and while it didn't happen often the time it did was the one where it made the largest difference.

    Obviously this is due to how complex it is to make correct heuristics regarding those more advanced optimizations. This can be rectified by using PGO (profile-guided optimization) where the compiler gathers all necessary runtime data during an initial run which is then used to correctly determine when and when not to use certain optimizations in order to maximize performance.

    When using PGO I've never encountered a situation where -O3 hasn't beaten -O2, the downside of course is that compilation becomes more complex since you need to perform a information gathering execution of the code in between two compiles.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    416

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aleve Sicofante View Post
    Why don't you feel the need to tell your readers what's this all about? Why do you take it for granted everyone knows what you're talking about?

    I have no idea what Dirndl is or what it is all about. If you have explained it before, put a link to that earlier article. If you haven't, put a link to an external source that explains it.

    This is web journalism 101 and you miss it all the time.
    This.
    I have no idea what this article is even about.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,560

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pvtcupcakes View Post
    This.
    I have no idea what this article is even about.
    It's explained in the article.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    288

    Default

    For who is wondering about the compiler deathmatch.. here it is: http://phoronix.com/forums/showthrea...339#post175339

    From some months ago but the compiler world doesn't move that fast so the results are probably still valid.

    Note the interesting thing in C-Ray. They seem to stay the same with every compiler in that deathmatch! Now if you look at that "Drindl" from this thread you see that C-Ray performs WAY better so, that "Drindl" thing must be doing something magic to perform so much better.

    Interesting speculation in here
    Last edited by markg85; 06-10-2011 at 03:35 PM.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    213

    Default

    Well, I think that since michael is comparing dirndl to ubuntu, it is something that goes inside the kernel or the os in general. Maybe I'm wrong, but it's the only hint I can guess from the article.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •