06-14-2011, 09:27 AM
We should build OpenMPI no problem. If you've got an AMD cluster I bet you'll be happy you did. (Intel will heavily depend on your code)
Originally Posted by RealNC
06-14-2011, 09:29 AM
06-14-2011, 09:33 AM
Originally Posted by xir_
1) We may give you better performance (Even Intel on Intel code - you'll have to test though)
2) We'll likely support everything you need for Fortran now
3) If you hit trouble there's a community of people to help you
06-14-2011, 09:36 AM
The code around the autopar is already out. Check github.com/path64/compiler
Originally Posted by elanthis
You'd be looking in what we call the "middle end" and for more in-depth answer please post the question on path64-dev, email me personally or drop on by #pathscale - irc.freenode.net to see if one of the engineers can help point you in the right direction
06-14-2011, 09:40 AM
I think some companies do a good job of handling open source and they aren't all scary acquisition targets.
Originally Posted by timofonic
We need to update our main website #1 (work-in-progress) and then see what doesn't fit and push the rest to the path64 community site. This way we get the message out the most people. (Someone bug me if this isn't fix this week)
06-14-2011, 10:02 AM
Codestr0m, I'm curious to know if you guys plan on providing any distro specific packaging? Something like using the openSUSE build service to create native packages for the more popular distros.
06-14-2011, 10:06 AM
06-14-2011, 10:10 AM
While I don't see GCC going anywhere in a hurry, having another compiler suite around is a good thing. I see this as more complementing existing solutions - just as there's some languages better suited to various tasks, there are compilers better suited to various projects. I may have to see about testing this out.
Sorry if it's already mentioned somewhere, but how's the C++0x support?
06-14-2011, 10:15 AM
I don't want to mix things up here, but EKOPath probably won't see C++0x for a while. (Maybe next major release, but don't hold me to that)
Originally Posted by mirv
ENZO will *maybe* get C++0x around the same time the standard actually becomes an official standard. (Yes we could push it out much sooner, but many people would have to request it tbh)
06-14-2011, 10:29 AM
Cheers for the quick response. About what I figured, but never hurts to ask.
Originally Posted by codestr0m
Tags for this Thread