The campaign still has a long way to go, but I wouldn't object at all to them putting another 6 months into it.
As far as the graphics engine goes, all they have to do now is fix any bugs and improve performance -- they don't have to make it look any prettier. It's already plenty beautiful.
They just have to work on making gameplay more tactical and interesting, with more advancement options as far as technology etc, and maybe some kind of persistent advancement system between matches (especially for the campaign), so that each individual battlefield situation carries over something into the next.
Once they do that, and if they can make the campaign longer and more interesting, it'll be a good game. I don't care if they take several more months to work on it. I hope they do, because I realize it's costing them a lot of money to do it, but it would pay off in the end because the game would be more compelling and bring in more sales. They need to get some more operating capital (somehow) and turn this into a game that is, at least, as compelling as an AAA title (it can be done, even without the budget of an AAA developer, you just have to have imagination and a unique idea).


Reply With Quote

