Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32

Thread: Mozilla Puts Out Firefox 5.0 Web Browser

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    772

    Default

    I don't remember where I read this, but wasn't the version number bumped because it's a separate branch from trunk rather than development on the 4.x branch?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,149

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ex-Cyber View Post
    I don't remember where I read this, but wasn't the version number bumped because it's a separate branch from trunk rather than development on the 4.x branch?
    They've simply moved to a time-based release schedule rather than basing it on features.

    So every 3 months a new major version will be released, whereas before they would attempt to add a bunch of new features and wait until it was working before releasing.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    .ca
    Posts
    403

    Default

    FWIW, there seems to be general agreement that FF5 is better than FF4. So as long as they stick to higher version number == better softare we ought to be ok.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,148

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bbordwell View Post
    This does not seem to be in the source archives yet (ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/), have they moved the location for downloading the source for releases?
    Look again, it's there.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Slovakia
    Posts
    77

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smitty3268 View Post
    They've simply moved to a time-based release schedule rather than basing it on features.

    So every 3 months a new major version will be released, whereas before they would attempt to add a bunch of new features and wait until it was working before releasing.
    Actually, I think they will be releasing a major version every 6 WEEKs. The current Firefox 6 is on Aurora channel for 2 more weeks and then on beta for 6 weeks. Then the release is set. The 2 week delay only exists between FF 5 (which was done faster) and FF 6 and will not exist in next versions.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    962

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by droidhacker View Post
    Do-not-track: a pointless header that anybody who WOULD be inclined to track you would ignore. I don't see any value in this header, it does NOTHING to improve privacy. What would be a nice addition to the android version would be, rather than this pointlessness, PRIVATE BROWSING (no storage of cache/history/cookies/anything to device).
    That DNT header is not a cure-all as the standards don't require sites to honor it, so indeed this is a pointless feature at the moment

    FF5 is noticeably faster for sure...some memory leaks fixed too

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    845

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by locovaca View Post
    Obviously Mozilla does, otherwise they wouldn't have switched to the "My version number dick is bigger than yours" system.
    It pretty much guarantees more exposure on tech sites, I dare say 'version 5 is out!' yields more coverage than 'version 4.1 is out!' no matter what the actual improvements are.

    Also faster turnaround on major version numbers likely gives the impression that more is happening with the software than actually is, worked for Chrome ('hory shet, it's already at version 13!! this software must be so great!!').

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,128

    Default

    Actually the effect is already weaning off, all the Chrome and FF dick-waving is causing everyone to start ignoring major version announcements, even for software that does not follow that model.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    Actually the effect is already weaning off, all the Chrome and FF dick-waving is causing everyone to start ignoring major version announcements, even for software that does not follow that model.
    Heh, I stopped caring about FF releases after 1.x series. After that it became just another bloated browser.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    845

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    Heh, I stopped caring about FF releases after 1.x series. After that it became just another bloated browser.
    Bloated in what respect? Memory-wise it uses the least amount of ram when using ~20+ pages when compared to the other mainstream browsers (Chrome, IE, Safari, Opera).

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •