Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 99

Thread: Open-Source Radeon HD 6000 Series Still Borked

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,294

    Default Open-Source Radeon HD 6000 Series Still Borked

    Phoronix: Open-Source Radeon HD 6000 Series Still Borked

    The first of the AMD Radeon HD 6000 "Northern Islands" graphics cards launched late last year, and while the open-source Linux driver support is technically there for those interested in this alternative to the proprietary Catalyst driver, the support is still largely broken. Here is a quick look.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=16179

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    989

    Default

    So glad that I stuck with my 5970 instead of jumping to this minor generation update. It doesn't introduce a new level of OGL/D3d APIs, nor does it shrink the process size! Completely useless imho.

    People looking for a good card to run on r600g should try to find a HD5870 or 5970 -- the support for evergreen is really in a much more sane state than Cayman / NI. Six months from now they may be on par, but six months is an eternity for people who upgrade their graphics card every 2 - 3 years.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    106

    Thumbs up

    another example that some others software like drivers made by ati or nvidia , or even the "Tuxera NTFS" and nftfs M$ filesystem should be used .
    linux would earn a lot to use whats best

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    230

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jcgeny View Post
    another example that some others software like drivers made by ati or nvidia , or even the "Tuxera NTFS" and nftfs M$ filesystem should be used .
    linux would earn a lot to use whats best
    There is people that also care about freedom and open source code and in my point of view on the long term open source code is always better because it gives you freedom (you not dependant from any company to provide you something that they might stop at any moment for what ever reasons).

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,926

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jcgeny View Post
    another example that some others software like drivers made by ati or nvidia , or even the "Tuxera NTFS" and nftfs M$ filesystem should be used .
    linux would earn a lot to use whats best
    OMG what a troll!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,586

    Default

    i am still stunned on how easy people that spent their life/work on computers all day (coders etc) get trolled

    @jcgeny

    you get a 2/10

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    ฿ 16LDJ6Hrd1oN3nCoFL7BypHSEYL84ca1JR
    Posts
    1,020

    Default

    Maybe it could also be tested with the drm-radeon-testing branch of the kernel. There should be the latest work available that maybe didn't make it to mainline yet.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    820

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by allquixotic View Post
    People looking for a good card to run on r600g should try to find a HD5870 or 5970
    Good luck finding one. They appear to be out of production, and pre-owned cards are sold for record prices.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,023

    Default Michael, no one from AMD has ever said this

    Further out, we are excited about the Radeon HD 8000 series when there should be a major open-source milestone in that we'll hopefully see on-time open-source Linux support for this hardware right around the time the hardware first ships.
    Yet you repeat it constantly. You're setting everyone up for a lot of disappointment if it doesn't come about. All AMD has said is that for that generation of cards they were involved from the beginning of the hardware design for the first time - they haven't said anything about the timing of releasing support for it. Further, hasn't this milestone already been reached? Llano support is ready, isn't it, and that is just being released right now.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,385

    Default

    Good catch. The "fact" is that we will be able to work on open source driver design in parallel with proprietary driver design for the first time. The "hoped for outcome" is solid open source driver support closer to launch time, and possibly the first launch-time support for a new generation of discrete GPUs.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •