Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Intel Gallium3D Continues Seeing Changes

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,638

    Default Intel Gallium3D Continues Seeing Changes

    Phoronix: Intel Gallium3D Continues Seeing Changes

    Last week I mentioned that it looked like Google was interested in Gallium3D for Chromium OS. That has turned out to be the case and the flow of changes to the community Intel Gallium3D driver has only continued to increase...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=OTYxNA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,656

    Default

    the newer than i965 chipsets (i5 etc) are not covered at all by g3d right????

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 89c51 View Post
    the newer than i965 chipsets (i5 etc) are not covered at all by g3d right????
    There is a driver, but nobody seems to be actively hacking on it. The last commit specifically for i965g is from January,

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    90

    Default

    Basically Intel can squeeze better performance out of a Gallium3D driver than a classic Mesa driver for the older Intel integrated graphics they are using right now for their mobile Chromium OS notebook/netbook.
    Shouldn't it be Google squeezing?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,656

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by whizse View Post
    There is a driver, but nobody seems to be actively hacking on it. The last commit specifically for i965g is from January,
    ok

    i thought that i965 was a previous generation and different than the ix series. got confused with all the intel chipsets

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    983

    Default

    I think i965 as the driver name is meant to imply from i965 and upward, similar to how the r300 driver covers r300, r400 and r500.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    989

    Default

    I have a 965-based ultraportable ThinkPad. Too bad it can't run on the i915g code that Stephane is hacking on; I suspect that code will be looking quite good by the time Google is shipping that driver in production machines.

    OTOH, the Intel-sponsored mainline i965c driver works extremely well here, with SNA. It drives Gnome 3 perfectly.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    156

    Default

    Well, the firt time i tried i915g from git it was really faster then classic mesa, the second time it featured about 35fps with extreme tux racer (this was about 2 weeks ago) while mesa did about 15.
    Looking forward for new commits!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,102

    Default benchmarks

    I'll be sure to deliver a fresh set of Intel Gallium3D benchmarks to see how it compares to the classic i915 Mesa driver.
    Please, please, please, make sure that LLVM is enabled in the driver even if it isn't the default. It clearly will be in anything Google ships, as that's the main reason to prefer the gallium driver right now. If you have to show the non-llvm version as well, ok, but don't leave the llvm version out completely.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •