Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Mesa's OpenGL 3.0 TODO List Is Becoming Smaller

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    424

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smitty3268 View Post
    and float-depth buffers: now done. Thanks Marek. http://lists.freedesktop.org/archive...ne/009085.html

    At this rate, maybe we should be shooting for GL 3.1 for the next release.
    I think this just made me cum a little bit...

    Thanks for the list and the sum-up! I agree with previous commenters, the leap from 2.1 -> 3.0 is huge in comparison to 3.0 -> 3.3. Even the step to 4.1 isn't as big I guess.

    I do hope that the maintenance of the fixed pipeline doesn't drag down the momentum of working with the newer and leaner OpenGL.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    All it took was more patents to stop caring about them; as mr. Bridgman showed, there is now even a patent for your lungs.

    So I'm assuming that none of this will work, unless your distro vendor has a patent license, or you recompile it yourself with '-middlefingerToPatentTrolls:1', or something?

    So if one wanted to be a total treehugger, what functionality would they miss? Texture compression and HW-float? Or much more?

    Also; when is somebody going to patent HW-double as an invention, to be able to fully support the float without getting patent trolled?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by przemoli View Post
    AMD and Nvidia got their hands on OpenGL 3, much earlier then whole world, so it is pretty obvious that they got time to take leap ahead of mesa.

    So is anyone from mesa in arb? To get preview on whats big next thing in OpenGL?
    Ian Romanick is described as "Intelís lead representative to Khronos":
    http://software.intel.com/sites/oss/...d_romanick.php

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    983

    Default

    There's an almost complete implementation of GL_ARB_debug_output available, which should be part of 4.1, doesn't seem to be listed in docs/GL3.txt though:
    http://lists.freedesktop.org/archive...ay/007248.html

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,211

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by whizse View Post
    Ian Romanick is described as "Intelís lead representative to Khronos":
    http://software.intel.com/sites/oss/...d_romanick.php
    Doesn't VMWare own Khronos? And they are big contributers to Mesa.

    I don't think getting the upcoming specs fast enough is a problem. The problem was that for years Linux graphics languished and got way behind. When GL3 and 4 came out, AMD and Nvidia just had to tweak a few of the extensions they already had working. Mesa had to start laying the groundwork to support future work enabling them.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smitty3268 View Post
    Doesn't VMWare own Khronos? And they are big contributers to Mesa.
    No, nobody owns Khronos.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khronos_Group

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •