[QUOTE=werfu;217330]And Apple possibility to attack them for patents infrigments./QUOTE]
S3 Graphics are currently attacking Apple because of the S3TC patent and just yesterday a lawyer decided Apple is indeed injuring the patent and is guilty.
No, you misuderstood me. I quoted that guy saying that M$ charges 15$ for their own OS (not for Android), implying they charge 5$ for Android obviously.
This is what I mean:
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/google-a...news-6264.html
[QUOTE=werfu;217330]And Apple possibility to attack them for patents infrigments./QUOTE]
S3 Graphics are currently attacking Apple because of the S3TC patent and just yesterday a lawyer decided Apple is indeed injuring the patent and is guilty.
Check this out: http://www.dailytech.com/Microsoft+W...ticle22079.htm
Crystal clear, I'd say.
Last edited by cl333r; 07-06-2011 at 12:07 PM.
All companies have a set of values to guide their actions, and obviously Microsoft's values aren't all that ethic and fair. Just because all companies exist to make money, doesn't mean that all means are valid, because if it was like that there would only be drugs and prostitution "companies" :P
If action X yields a net profit, a company will take it regardless of what values it may say it upholds.
E.g. company A makes planes and a flaw is discovered that takes a billion to fix. If statistically that flaw may cause about 5 crashes over the lifespan of the affected model and the company figures it may pay .4bn as damages and another .1bn to authorities not to force them to fix the problem, it will not fix the problem.
No company that I know of ever fired a high-ranking executive because of lack of ethics, without a prior public scandal. It's always a cost-effective measure rather than upholding ethics.
Of course, this is mostly human nature, not some company inherent evil.