Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 72

Thread: GNOME & KDE Developers Go To Battle Over A Name

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,927

    Default

    What else should they call it? It controls system settings, FFS.

    facepalm

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,927

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by monraaf View Post
    LOL! Hilarious! The childishness of the KDE developers never ceases to amaze me. 'Activities' revisited (another word they claimed a stake on).
    Well, I guess they would be less childish if the GNOME guys hadn't spent the last 10 years reimplementing all their ideas poorly and trying to kill them with FUD in the process.

    But this particular battle is quite childish, yes.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by monraaf View Post
    LOL! Hilarious! The childishness of the KDE developers never ceases to amaze me. 'Activities' revisited (another word they claimed a stake on).
    Gnome devs have been just as childish over the years.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    459

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by markg85 View Post
    My proposal as posted on the list:
    ust a small suggestion on how i think this should be "fixed" (since 2
    desktop files for one app seems just ugly to me).
    Perhaps it's better to extend the desktop file specification:
    http://standards.freedesktop.org/des...t/ar01s05.html

    And i would propose adding 2 entries:
    NativeDE - This one holds the desktop environment name where the app
    would be "native". So GNOME, KDE or whatever.
    NameNonNative - This one holds the app name when it's shown in a
    desktop environment that is not native. When not set fallback to
    "Name"

    So for example the "System Settings" app in KDE looks somewhat like
    this in a .desktop file:

    Name=System Settings
    NativeDE=KDE
    NameNonNative=KDE System Settings

    The same applies for gnome system settings and also for the system
    monitor (that also has the naming issue)
    Isn't this a good solution?

    Regards,
    Mark
    I second this.

    And seriously.
    KDE should call their system settings
    KDE System Settings
    and Gnome should call their system settings
    GNOME System Settings

    This is what namespaces are for.
    Last edited by plonoma; 07-23-2011 at 12:32 PM.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    72

    Angry Desktop Environment Settings

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    Well, "System Settings" suggests system wide administration. IMO, both KDE and Gnome chose a poor name. It should be "Desktop Environment Settings".
    YES! i was going to say that they should BOTH choose a different name because both names are STUPID. it should be KDE System Settings and GNOME System Settings.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    677

    Default

    Both should use "Desktop Settings" as the name.

    If the technology doesn't support that, then fix it.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    1.Both "Settings" fall FAR beyond of simple "Desktop Environment Settings". System Settings is CORRECT.
    2. However, one desktop environment carries name GNOME, and its "System Settings" is not usable without it; and another is KDE, and again its "System Settings" is not usable without KDE installed.

    They should name:
    KDE System Settings
    and
    GNOME System Settings

    and if some DE implements similar:
    "$DE_Name_Here" System Settings

    -Resolved?

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,927

    Default

    I think that a major problem would be if the binaries are called the same thing. I don't know how it is handled at the moment, but KDE's app is called "systemsettings".

    Imagine if Ubuntu released an editor called "gcc".
    Last edited by pingufunkybeat; 07-23-2011 at 02:44 PM.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    401

    Default

    I am an ardent KDE-fan and see little use for Gnome. But, the sentence

    As KDE occupied this name first, it is ours as a result, and I will NOT be relinquishing it to satisfy your personal (selfish) desires, which will cause numerous problems for users on both sides.
    signed by a maintainer named Ben Cooksley is just too much. THAT is not how to contact the Gnome camp and without being a developer for either side I apologize on anyone's behalf for vitriolic statements like that. I don't care if this has a "history" preceded by informal contacts. Any first public reaction should be polite.

    If this was the first public reaction, in my view that Ben Cooksley may better be removed from being the maintainer as soon as possible, unless he makes a public apology. This is really sad.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    621

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sabriah View Post
    If this was the first public reaction, in my view that Ben Cooksley may better be removed from being the maintainer as soon as possible, unless he makes a public apology. This is really sad.
    I think he should be banned from making any public statements on behalf of the KDE project, regardless of whether he will make an apology or not. This is a very bad PR move for KDE.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •