Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 69

Thread: A Fork Of GNOME 2: The Mate Desktop

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    945

    Default

    Oh gawd... not another KDE3-type thingy :P

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by markg85 View Post
    interesting development but not so good.
    Keeping old code (gtk2) alive when their is a way better gtk3 version is just being plain ignorant. They should fork the latest gnome version, drop the default gui and develop and upgrade the fallback mode. In the end that will also benefit Gnome..
    I agree 100%.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by markg85 View Post
    interesting development but not so good.
    Keeping old code (gtk2) alive when their is a way better gtk3 version is just being plain ignorant. They should fork the latest gnome version, drop the default gui and develop and upgrade the fallback mode. In the end that will also benefit Gnome. Note that this isn't the first time a "fork" is attempted. A couple years ago their where a bunch of patches that gnome wouldn't accept. Those where all put on a site and where kept up to date for some time. It never came to a full fork and it eventually died.

    as for "dash" .. That's both smart and stupid of canonical. Smart, the use of QML since that way they both have software and hardware rendering depending on the used hardware. That's very smart! However, they are using a Gnome environment with Gnome apps but with this they add a huge Qt dependency.. That is not so smart. But hey, they can't rely on cairo for this stuff

    Yeah, two interesting developments but both aren't that good in their current form.
    I agree. Personally I actually really enjoy using gnome-shell, but understand why some dislike it. The fact is even though gnome-shell is a big change and some people want the old pardagrim, forking gnome 2 is a terrible idea and a waste of resources. Gnome 3/GTK3 have many improvements under the hood. Why not fork gnome 3? Create a new shell that behaves more like gnome 2? Hell, gnome-shell is written in CSS and Javascript, why not fork gnome-shell and customize it so it looks and feels more like gnome 2? Then you would still have the excellent customization abilities gnome-shell gives us (extensions). Anything based off of gnome 3 would be a much better application of resources.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    267

    Default

    I find it funny how alot of people here are bashing this Gnome fork. Saying you should work on this or work on that, blah blah blah,
    When I doubt most or any of you are even Gtk or Qt developers. I spent 8 years writing code for Gnome and the last 4 writing code
    for Qt/Kde. And I have been a kde-look, gnome-look, ....... Editor for many years.

    http://kde-look.org/usermanager/sear...sername=comtux

    The Mate Desktop developers are working on something they feel is worth while. And there doing it for free.

    So your not allowed to have an opinion on how you feel would be a better use of there time.
    Last edited by zester; 08-31-2011 at 09:09 AM.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    897

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zester View Post
    So your not allowed to have an opinion on how you feel would be a better use of there time.
    FOSS: Absolutely free, as long as you do as I say.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,283

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zester View Post
    The Mate Desktop developers are working on something they feel is worth while. And there doing it for free. So your(sic) not allowed to have an opinion on how you feel would be a better use of there time.
    STFU. Of course I'm "allowed" to have an opinion (free as in freedom, not free as in beer).

  7. #47
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    187

    Default

    Its good to see people still have that angry passion when it comes to gui's. I find gnome 2 and KDE perfectly usable, and gnome 3 is coming along great. What we really need next is port of gnome 1! No reason.... Just completes the set.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    869

    Default you are funny ^^

    Quote Originally Posted by _cas_ View Post
    If the panel was fixed (mostly get rid of the stupid hard-coded 3 regions and let me put launchers where *I* want them and stopped wasting precious panel space reminding me what my name is), i'd be reasonably happy switching to Gnome 3 Fallback at home. Also, I want my applets. And I want the clock on the far right of the top menu, not in the middle of the screen. and i want the systray on the far right of the bottom panel, right next to my desktop pager.
    first you say that, then you say that:

    Quote Originally Posted by _cas_ View Post
    I guess theming is important if you care about that kind of thing. I don't very much. I just want a convenient way of launching common apps and displaying various status applets about my system. I don't care much what it looks like as long as it isn't garish, doesn't have distracting animations, and doesn't get in my way.
    You know theming is in gnome not only to have other button colors or stuff you can completly define the look you want. So moving the clock to the right position should be no big tast, just work on a css file. But maybe I am wrong I just made one minor change at one time on the theme file.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nevertime View Post
    Its good to see people still have that angry passion when it comes to gui's. I find gnome 2 and KDE perfectly usable, and gnome 3 is coming along great. What we really need next is port of gnome 1! No reason.... Just completes the set.
    <3, you are radical

  10. #50
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zester View Post
    I find it funny how alot of people here are bashing this Gnome fork. Saying you should work on this or work on that, blah blah blah,
    When I doubt most or any of you are even Gtk or Qt developers. I spent 8 years writing code for Gnome and the last 4 writing code
    for Qt/Kde. And I have been a kde-look, gnome-look, ....... Editor for many years.

    http://kde-look.org/usermanager/sear...sername=comtux

    The Mate Desktop developers are working on something they feel is worth while. And there doing it for free.

    So your not allowed to have an opinion on how you feel would be a better use of there time.
    I'm allowed to have an opinion on whatever I wish to. I feel time would better be served working with currently maintained code, and the same goal that mate is reaching for could be achieved with less maintenance headaches.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •