Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: An Open-Source Mobile Linux Graphics Stack?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,371

    Default An Open-Source Mobile Linux Graphics Stack?

    Phoronix: An Open-Source Mobile Linux Graphics Stack?

    The mobile device landscape, particularly for those devices running Linux, is quickly evolving. Just in the past few days, Google bought Motorola, Qualcomm open-sourced the remainder of their Gobi API for controlling modems, and HP ended off all their webOS devices, among other changes. But will the future mobile Linux device landscape deal with more open-source drivers, particularly when it comes to graphics?..

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=OTgyMA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,038

    Default Android x86

    I was surprised you didn't mention that Mesa is currently adding Android x86 support.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,386

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smitty3268 View Post
    I was surprised you didn't mention that Mesa is currently adding Android x86 support.
    Yep. Mesa has been running on Android for a while but you have to build it in a non-standard way -- IIRC a lot of the current work is adding Android build support and build targets to the native Mesa build framework. That's what it looks like anyways

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,603

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Yep. Mesa has been running on Android for a while but you have to build it in a non-standard way -- IIRC a lot of the current work is adding Android build support and build targets to the native Mesa build framework. That's what it looks like anyways
    so is there a chance that android will use a full open stack in the future?? (linux--> G3D --> maybe wayland -->toolkit)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,386

    Default

    I would say "yes with the usual caveats" - if there is an open stack for hardware on regular Linux you'll see a corresponding open stack on Android for sure. On the other hand if there is no open stack today I wouldn't expect everyone to open up just for Android.

    The harder question is what will go into high volume production, depending on things like video decode (it's a lot easier to "do it in software" on a quad core 2.9 ghz desktop than on a dual core 800 mhz tablet) and 3D performance (will mobile hardware vendors end up getting picked based on benchmarks or will there be a "fast enough" mindset ?).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    will mobile hardware vendors end up getting picked based on benchmarks or will there be a "fast enough" mindset ?
    I think battery life is a big factor. Decode on a chip or in software... I think it's not going to happen soon, especialy because that iPad 2 gets their ten hours of battery life because of some special dedicated ARM modification sauce (offload common OS tasks with dedicated CPU circuitry), as rumored.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •