I am finding that the dynamic linker is unwilling to find libGL.so.1.2 in the /usr/lib/fglrx directory, despite there correctly being an entry in /etc/ld.so.conf.d that lists the directory name. I was forced to add a symlink /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 to the /usr/lib/fglrx/libGL.so.1.2 shared object.
When I tried to run prelink on glxinfo, I received the following error:
prelink: /usr/bin/glxinfo: Cannot prelink against non-PIC shared library /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
Hmm i can't seem to get direct rendering working for my V5200 on Arch Linux. Anyone have any success?
Then I had to install a symlink in /usr/lib to /usr/lib/fglrx/libGL.so.1 by hand.
Which ChipID are you using in your xorg.conf file?
Same problem here. Mobility FireGL T2 with ChipID 1002:4e54, using the Mobility 9600 ID: 1002:4c66.
My name ist Llogi, btw. Following this forum for some month now. That damn driver led me to my first post here.
At first I applied Ambro814s patch http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5203.
Instead of "./ati-installer.sh 8.41.7 --install" I built the package using "./ati-installer.sh 8.41.7 --buildpkg Ubuntu/gutsy" following the instructions from here: http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubu...allation_Guide
I even linked the libGL like You told some posts before.
Unfortunatley I don't even see the XServer. I get kicked to console before the login-screen appears.
Questions: how EXACTLY do I have to type the ChipID? 1002:4c66, 0x4c66 or just 4c66?
BTW: Following exatly the instruction of Ambro814 with "--install" instead of "--buildpk" did not work either.
Any help is appreciated.
Post has not been eaten. Sorry for doubleposting.
Last edited by Llogi; 10-24-2007 at 07:53 AM.
I believe it's:Questions: how EXACTLY do I have to type the ChipID? 1002:4c66, 0x4c66 or just 4c66?
The Chip Id should be correct:
scanpci and http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/ATI_Mobility_FireGL_T2 are identical. The wiki says "Chipset: ATI RV350 (M10) - Similar to Radeon 9600"
Btw: here is, what the Xorg.log tells me
I'm not that good in reading log-files. "But Fatal server error: no screens found" does not sound to good.