Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 103

Thread: FreeBSD: A Faster Platform For Linux Gaming Than Linux?

  1. #11

    Default

    You're not only comparing Linux vs FreeBSD. But also Unity vs KDE. And there's also some hardware differences. And then you come to the conclusion that the performance differences are due to the OS used?

    Ridiculous!

  2. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FireBurn View Post
    Do most users switch to a 'lighter' DM when playing games? Equally do most users switch off compositing before running a game (yes I know Kwin can do that automatically)

    The only thing I don't like about this article is the title it really should be "PC-BSD: A Faster Platform for Linux Gaming than Ubuntu"

    Everything else is using the default settings (plus the Nvidia blob) to see how fast games run

    You don't get more fairer than that really
    I just want to point out that PC-BSD ships with KDE.

  3. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AnonymousCoward View Post
    You're not only comparing Linux vs FreeBSD. But also Unity vs KDE. And there's also some hardware differences. And then you come to the conclusion that the performance differences are due to the OS used?

    Ridiculous!
    Linux versus Mac OS X comparisons compare not only Linux and Mac OS X, but whatever desktop environment Linux uses with the Mac OS X desktop environment. It is fair for a Ubuntu versus PC-BSD comparison. As for Linux versus FreeBSD, it would probably be better to use KDE on both systems.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    776

    Default

    So.. FreeBSD is faster in a small set of circumstances (nVidia GPU with closed drivers), but doesn't run most of the games in others (ATI, OS drivers). I'm not sure that counts as a win for FreeBSD.

    Seriously, if I wanted a tainted kernel with a KDE workspace and great gaming performance, I'd install windows. Even works with ATIs closed drivers!


    Still, these numbers are interesting - if there's a bottleneck in linux, it needs to be found and eliminated. If only the numbers were useful in determining that.
    As others have mentioned, adding another distribution would be important to determine whether FreeBSD is faster than "Linux" or just faster than "Ubuntu". The article isn't too clear about possible differences due to different window managers, which always raises a red flag. It's difficult to trust the data when such issues aren't documented.


    But, of course, the point of the headline is to generate clicks and ad-revenue, not to deliver useful numbers or research the actual causes for the difference. Why am I expecting more?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    58

    Default

    I would like to see FreeBSD against Gentoo Linux, which I assume that should be one of the best performance Linux distribution.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    912

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fernandoc1 View Post
    I would like to see FreeBSD against Gentoo Linux, which I assume that should be one of the best performance Linux distribution.
    Only if you've set it up properly, and even then it might not make a large difference. Gentoo has its strengths in customisation and clean package management; performance is just a by-product of being a source-based distro. So you might see better performance in cpu-bound games that are compiled from source, I doubt you'll see much difference with something like Unigine's Heaven benchmark. That assumes all other things are equal of course, but they won't be: Gentoo being a rolling release will have different xserver versions, kernel, gcc, etc etc etc.
    Last edited by mirv; 09-07-2011 at 08:24 AM.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    88

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fernandoc1 View Post
    I would like to see FreeBSD against Gentoo Linux, which I assume that should be one of the best performance Linux distribution.
    Your assumption is like that of a Marxist, that work and value are inseparable.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    66

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by garytr24
    Your assumption is like that of a Marxist, that work and value are inseparable.
    I tip my hat to you, sir!

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    48

    Default

    So using two somewhat different setups you find that the Nvidia BSD driver is faster than the Nvidia Linux driver?

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    600

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Otus View Post
    So using two somewhat different setups you find that the Nvidia BSD driver is faster than the Nvidia Linux driver?
    Here's the thing, unless someone compares a barebone (low-end WM; composition disabled; services disabled; etc) on both ends, even this relatively benign statement above cannot be verified.

    ... The sad part of it is that AFAICS Michael is *indeed* trying to be productive, but somehow, his benchmark methodology always leaves something major behind

    - Gilboa
    Last edited by gilboa; 09-07-2011 at 10:40 AM.
    DEV: Intel S2600C0, 2xE52658V2, 32GB, 4x2TB, GTX780, F20/x86_64, Dell U2711.
    SRV: Intel S5520SC, 2xX5680, 36GB, 4x2TB, GTX550, F20/x86_64, Dell U2412..
    BACK: Tyan Tempest i5400XT, 2xE5335, 8GB, 3x1.5TB, 9800GTX, F20/x86-64.
    LAP: ASUS N56VJ, i7-3630QM, 16GB, 1TB, 635M, F20/x86_64.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •