Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: A Happy Four Years To An Open-Source ATI/AMD

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,811

    Default A Happy Four Years To An Open-Source ATI/AMD

    Phoronix: A Happy Four Years To An Open-Source ATI/AMD

    It was four years ago, on the 6th of September 2007, that I exclusively broke the news on AMD's open-source strategy that would end up greatly changing the open-source Linux graphics driver landscape...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=OTg4NA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    80

    Default Thank you

    Thank you AMD And everybody who works on the Mesa/Gallium/DDX and DRM Drivers.

    As an owner of a AMD 6850 and E350 all that is really lacking is a decent working dynamic power management and audio oder HDMI.
    Besides that, I am very pleased with the current state.
    The only way for me to really say "thank you" is to continue buying AMD Hardware. Looking forward to get a Bulldozer

    Gregor

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    574

    Default

    I must admit I'm proud of being an AMD customer. Hopefully the open driver will get better and better in the near future.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in front of my box :p
    Posts
    794

    Default

    I also see a good way of improvement over the past years. I followed this development, well, and even though there are some bumps on the road (UVD, power management on par with fglrx and recent opengl support) I am happy with my choice to use AMD-ATI stuff in my boxes. Ok, I use AMD for many years now anyway, but often in combination with nvidia chips. And since the announcement of specs release I turned to using AMD-ATI chips for the GPU part.
    Hopefully I'll also call an APU soon my own.

    Thanks to all the hackers and workers over there. And to Michael for covering this issue and probably also applying a certain kind of public pressure.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    768

    Default

    Four years in which I changed from a mix of Intel and AMD CPUs with nVidia GPUs to full AMD+ATI machines, using a full open source software stack. Thank you AMD!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    988

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mcgreg View Post
    As an owner of a AMD 6850 and E350 all that is really lacking is a decent working dynamic power management and audio oder HDMI.
    And video decode acceleration! By ignoring this aspect AMD is missing out on a large part of the Linux HTPC market.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Thanks amd.

    The main reason I bought an amd video card, is the open source driver.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    577

    Default

    Me too bought an RS690 and now an RS880 because of the great open source support. I'm guessing my next purchase will be a bulldozer or at the very least a laptop with discreet AMD graphics

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    9

    Default Both happy and sad

    I'm happy that things have improved for open source gpu drivers in general, not just for ATI/AMD. I have a sore spot though. I hate that I pretty much cannot do anything productive OR entertaining on the open source graphics drivers out there today. What I mean is, they don't perform even close (most of the time) to the official proprietary drivers. They don't do decent video playback, have poor FPS in games or just don't render correctly, don't do good for workstation usage, and from what I last understood, don't do opencl. They only thing they CAN do is a basic composited desktop, which is the least of my worries. Now, if X allowed me to switch drivers on the fly, without restarting X, and losing all my running GUI apps, I could live with that. Supposedly Wayland will be better suited to this task, but I'm gonna bet right here and now it's gonna be 5 years before that feature works correctly and is default on ANY distro.

    I'm not a fan of Intel's graphics capabilities (well, sandy bridge is ok, for now), but they seem to be much more on track to having similar functionality to the windows equivalent driver than ATI/AMD or Nvidia opensource drivers ever thought about being, and this "fact" makes me sad....as I have an ATI card (4850) that I WISH I could run the opensource driver on and be happy with it...but I just can't...I've tried, it has it's gotchas. To be honest, the binary driver has it's issues, but they don't get in my way as often.

    Don't be mad, just sharing my perspective and experience.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    275

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lienmeat View Post
    I'm happy that things have improved for open source gpu drivers in general, not just for ATI/AMD. I have a sore spot though. I hate that I pretty much cannot do anything productive OR entertaining on the open source graphics drivers out there today. What I mean is, they don't perform even close (most of the time) to the official proprietary drivers. They don't do decent video playback, have poor FPS in games or just don't render correctly, don't do good for workstation usage, and from what I last understood, don't do opencl. They only thing they CAN do is a basic composited desktop, which is the least of my worries. Now, if X allowed me to switch drivers on the fly, without restarting X, and losing all my running GUI apps, I could live with that. Supposedly Wayland will be better suited to this task, but I'm gonna bet right here and now it's gonna be 5 years before that feature works correctly and is default on ANY distro.

    I'm not a fan of Intel's graphics capabilities (well, sandy bridge is ok, for now), but they seem to be much more on track to having similar functionality to the windows equivalent driver than ATI/AMD or Nvidia opensource drivers ever thought about being, and this "fact" makes me sad....as I have an ATI card (4850) that I WISH I could run the opensource driver on and be happy with it...but I just can't...I've tried, it has it's gotchas. To be honest, the binary driver has it's issues, but they don't get in my way as often.

    Don't be mad, just sharing my perspective and experience.

    Totally with you on that buddy.
    I wont bother buying AMD video card, unless it really kicks arse of Nvidia, performance/power consumption wise.

    I think somewhere on the Phoronix it was mentioned, that AMD doesn't care about performance of these cards on OSS driver.
    So yeah, I don't care about OSS driver, that doesn't compete with binary one. I buy expensive stuff not fo rcharity reasons to MEGA corporation like AMD.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •