Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Is VIA Back To Playing With Linux, Gallium3D?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,810

    Default Is VIA Back To Playing With Linux, Gallium3D?

    Phoronix: Is VIA Back To Playing With Linux, Gallium3D?

    Back in January I heard from VIA that their open-source Linux strategy / support was basically dead. They don't have the resources or justification to do the work any longer, and their Linux TODO list was basically shot. In the years since they announced they were trying to become open-source friendly (and follow the steps of ATI/AMD), they only managed to push out some partially open-source code and some chipset documentation. But could they be playing around with open-source graphics drivers again?..

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=OTkzNw

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,275

    Default

    Don't get your hopes up. He's probably trying to use Linux on a VIA machine and wants 3D softpipe. The kernel driver and DDX need work first. When you see VIA engineers inquiring about them, then there might actually be fire to go with the smoke.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DanL View Post
    Don't get your hopes up. He's probably trying to use Linux on a VIA machine and wants 3D softpipe. The kernel driver and DDX need work first. When you see VIA engineers inquiring about them, then there might actually be fire to go with the smoke.
    hi... what is wrong in a good "3D softpipe" support for VIA hardware on linux ?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,275

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Qaridarium View Post
    hi... what is wrong in a good "3D softpipe" support for VIA hardware on linux ?
    Nothing. All I was saying is that one little message to a dev list doesn't indicate that VIA is about to put any significant resources into open-source graphics development.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,287

    Default

    Frankly, I've lost any hope in getting code from VIA. I don't mean they don't want to be useful, but they really don't want to spend significant money, so all I expect from them is to release docs.
    Anyway, I might be wrong, and it could be better or worse than I think.

    What I do know because of the dev's mailing list of Openchrome is that Simmons wants to get the mesa openchrome's branch in shape once he's done with LVDS, KMS and RandR support. I hope he doesn't get annoyed of working so much time in the same thing alone.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in front of my box :p
    Posts
    794

    Default

    Can we, I mean VIA, please leave the dead rest in peace?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Talk is cheap. When VIA commits resource or at least publish something, then I'll believe it.

    Paul

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •