Sorry, but it's been 20 years since I last spoke or read German, so I can't read what you've written. However, I do believe that you have a tenuous grasp (on reality ) of English, so I'll just say: how can you argue that the 36% thermal efficiency of the EPR is wrong when we take the thermal power output of the reactor (4500MWt) and the electrical power output (1630MWe) and divide 1630 by 4500 to get 36%??? This is basic maths that my 8 year old can understand. Why can't you?
your only problem is the "german" language so i will translate it for you.
"ok we set "36%" as the efficiency and then comes some arguments against it:
Wikipedia: "because of the fact its a very big power plant you need longer cables to the customers because of this you lost energy on the cables in germany they lost 6% of the energy on the cable net because of this"
"↑ Monatsbericht über die Elektrizitätsversorgung Statistischen Bundesamts, Wiesbaden, Stand 4. Quartal 2008"
oh you lost another 6% now we calculate 36% -6%= 33,84 now you only have 33,84
now comes the maintenance work and the heat goes not into electricity now what?
Another wikipedia argument:
the second german text: "The efficiency of the total system drops down because of the energy to build it and run it and the energy cost of the demolition of the nuclear power plant and the energy consuming of earning the uran.
and a last argumentation: you lost energy by radioactivity
now try it again.
Originally Posted by Shielder
Ah, the old 'Adolf Hitler' defence. What's the problem, are the numbers I quoted (again, quoted below) too 'inconvenient' for you?
its not a defense its just Cynicism. and the defense is: the Germans now start the fight you will see results in 10 years.
Originally Posted by Shielder
So, in the second quarter, after the shutdown of those 8 reactors, Germany became a net importer of electricity. Completely blowing the OP out of the water.
the german now do an investment in 25 000 000 000€ in cables and 400 000 000 000€ in new power plants after this german will not be a importer of electricity.
but yes you don't understand the word "investment"
and statistic isn't valid until the end of the year this means we talk again on the end of the year.
Originally Posted by Shielder
Oh, and Quazimodo says that Germans are happy to pay for cables to transmit electricity. Yeah right. Electricity transport from the wind rich north to the wind poor south will go through areas designated as areas of outstanding natural beauty. The local populations do not want the cables to go through their valleys, over their hills and through their forests. So, how are you going to transport all of that clean green energy south to the industrial heartland of Germany?
you can also do this without any cable : Warden-cliff
(and again this isn't an argument its just cynicism again)
the trick about your statistic against solar power for example is just the time of running.
if you calculate it on 10 years or 20years your number is 200 dollars. if you run it on 40 years your number is 100 dollar this means its cheaper than nuclear power.
and my solar modules can work 40 years!
Yes. They are like that. They tend to trust manufacturers instead of talk on forums when it comes to lifetime.
And there is the English Version: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
Which is saying when confronted with facts, logic etc... a reasonable argument the other side [you, Q] spew a heap of bullshit that makes its pointless and impossible to reasonably argue with you. As evident.
The German Wikipedia say this to your claim:
"Zuerst ermesse man den verstandesmäßigen Horizont des Zielpublikums. Dann postuliere man eine Conclusio, welche man mit Fakten, die sich gerade noch innerhalb, und Halbwahrheiten die bereits außerhalb, aber immer noch in der Nähe des Horizonts des Opfers stehen, belegt. Abrunden kann man das ganze dann mit Begriffen, die sich dem Verständnis des Betrogenen bereits entziehen, von denen dieser jedoch schon gehört hat, was den Horizont des „Galoppierenden“ dann im Vergleich zum eigenen sehr weit wirken lassen, und die Inkompetenz des Opponenten suggerieren soll."
fast google translate:
""First of discre to the intellectual horizon of the target audience. Then posit a conclusion, which is full of facts, which is just inside, and half-truths that can already occupied outside, but are still near the horizon of the victim. Rounding it will then suggest the whole in terms that are beyond the understanding of the deceived already, but this is one of them has been what can be the horizon of the "Galloping" then act in comparison to their own very well, and the incompetence of opponents. ""
So it only works if the intellectual horizon of the discussion members is low and the discussion members do have no understanding.
But if so? I'm right anyway.
Thank you to prove me right because my enemies are low in Intellectual horizon and they do have no understanding.
You typing this from Chernobyl?
// sorry, couldn't ressist
Or from coal mines?
Summary of severe* accidents in energy chains for electricity 1969-2000
Energy chain Fatalities Fatalities/TWy Fatalities Fatalities/TWy
Coal 2259 157 18,000 597
Natural gas 1043 85 1000 111
Hydro 14 3 30,000 10,285
Nuclear 0 0 31 48
Data from Paul Scherrer Institut, in OECD 2010. * severe = more than 5 fatalities
Its in the food. I give you a good example of modern food. Mcdonalds Hamburger.
Bread-> genetically modified corn, grown with pestizides, mixed with great amount of white drug(sugar) to bump insulin production so person eats MOAR.
Meat -> genetically selected animals, grown in closed factories, in cages, rarely more than 4 months old, pumped with grown hormones and antibiotics to prevent epidemies(cause no animal can live in such conditions; both hormones and antibiotics stay within meat and are transfered into eaters blood system). The meat is grilled in palm oil(cheapest) which contains GREAT amount of saturated fatty acids and nothing else - palm oil literally trashes blood vessels and organs. And because its grilled welcome acrolein and other cancerogene or toxic substances, free radicals included.
Sauce -> genetically modified tomatos(in best cases) with pesticides, picked up in early stages from fields and transfered over 4 months to production plants over the sea, then made to ripe via gas, mixed with good amount of white drug(sugar) or its replacement(all - cancerogenes), emulsifiers(variety, to boost endproduct amount and minimize cost), good deal of glutamate.
Best served cold.
LOL yes... modern food is just like a nuclear reactor you never know when it flies into the air.