Now that's something I can believe instead of this wind power nonsense.
i do have 20 books in my bookshelf about electronic and physic.
i can give you the ISBN numbers.
Doesn't really matter. It's still fiction. Some small test power plants made and just ideas and plans for larger.
Last edited by virta; 10-01-2011 at 02:06 PM.
you can calculate this in the dimension to get day and night the same energy output.
the air is heating up on the floor goes into the updraft tower this is the first (updraft tower) then the hot air goes into a water raining system and cool down then the hot air cool down and starts to fall in the downdraft tower.
this is a twin-tower concept. with an 200MW updraft tower you can get 333MW with the twin up and down concept.
Biggest built yet has maximum power of 200KW. So as a real energy source it's still just fiction. It took wind power 70 years to go from concept to real economical source of energy.
Last edited by virta; 10-01-2011 at 03:39 PM.
if you only build the tower generator for the lowest point of updraft means 200MW then you have 200MW day and night.
you just need to calculate the size of the area to get the max power on the lowest point of temperature.
and i know what you say next: "o my god this is a pure waste of everything to calculate an updraft tower to the lowest point of the day"
no you are wrong! its a good way to get a power plant and a storage power plant fit into the same power plant.
also you don't react on the suggestion of combination an updraft dower with an downdraft tower.
with the same area use you have 333MW of electric power.
Anyhow. Whole conversation is quite pointless, since there is no real data available for anything you are "proposing". Just writing about xxxMW wind-dradft-mill-turbine doesn't make it any more real. Fiction.
Last edited by virta; 10-01-2011 at 06:17 PM.