Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: AMD Reverse HT on Linux

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James View Post
    Pure speculation, but with some sort of multi-cpu register coherency mechanism it should be possible to pipeline execution across multiple processors in manner similar to a single cpu.
    Having more than one CPU core executing a single instruction stream would give new dimensions to speculative execution. Good branch prediction is one thing, having multiple cores simply go ahead and speculatively execute both outcomes of the branch could boost the IPC.

  2. #12

    Default

    This has been done before. The very first IBM POWER cpu was actually a full card with 7 chips I think. One was an instruction dispatcher, and the others were execution units for floating point/integer operations. Each time an instruction arrived to the cpu, it would be sent by the dispatcher to an available core. The dispatcher would also store the results back in memory.

    I have such a beast , it says 1991 on it (FWIW, it's an IBM powerserver 320).

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    305

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marcheu View Post
    This has been done before. The very first IBM POWER cpu was actually a full card with 7 chips I think. One was an instruction dispatcher, and the others were execution units for floating point/integer operations. Each time an instruction arrived to the cpu, it would be sent by the dispatcher to an available core. The dispatcher would also store the results back in memory.

    I have such a beast , it says 1991 on it (FWIW, it's an IBM powerserver 320).
    IBM has done alot of things before... but the situation (or problem if you tend to like IBM and what it does) is that other people come along and do it at the right time, in a different way, or with the right marketing and make a ton of money off of it. Take for instance Windows versus OS/2. Obviously OS/2 was around before Windows, and many people say it was more technologically advanced. But Windows came out and was marketed in a way that made it sell much better than OS/2. You could say the same thing about Power architecture in general (versus x86-based processors).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •