Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: AMD Catalyst vs. Radeon Gallium3D On Linux 3.1

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,541

    Default AMD Catalyst vs. Radeon Gallium3D On Linux 3.1

    Phoronix: AMD Catalyst vs. Radeon Gallium3D On Linux 3.1

    If you are not taken by today's release of Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot", here are some new Radeon graphics benchmarks comparing the Catalyst driver on Ubuntu 11.10 to the latest R600g driver from Mesa 7.12-devel on the soon-to-be-released Linux 3.1 kernel.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=16517

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    104

    Default VDrift benchmarks are meaningless

    There's no point in continuously showing the VDrift performance results with the Gallium drivers if the rendering output is so horribly broken. That's equivalent to benchmarking AES encryption that spits out invalid data.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2

    Default

    I think it would be more relevant for the open source driver audience to review 2D and compositing.
    Also in this case CPU/RAM/power consumption would be more important than raw performance.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    399

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gigaplex View Post
    There's no point in continuously showing the VDrift performance results with the Gallium drivers if the rendering output is so horribly broken. That's equivalent to benchmarking AES encryption that spits out invalid data.
    Perhaps update to the latest version of VDrift that was released a month ago?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    574

    Default

    It would be interesting to see what the results would look like benchmarking the git head of mesa form the release dates of 2.6.39 3.0 & 3.1

    As improvements happen in tandem to drm and mesa it would give a fairer picture of the improvements in the 3D stack

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,337

    Default

    A new drm is not going to change 3D performance much. For 3D, the drm just takes the command buffer from the 3D driver and feeds it to the hw; not a lot has changed in that regard.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MatthiasF View Post
    I think it would be more relevant for the open source driver audience to review 2D and compositing.
    Also in this case CPU/RAM/power consumption would be more important than raw performance.
    I agree. I measured a few days ago my computer's power consumption, and I was shocked: The open source driver consumes 40W more than the official in idle (I have an 5770 in an arch linux machine).

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,927

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bbandi View Post
    I agree. I measured a few days ago my computer's power consumption, and I was shocked: The open source driver consumes 40W more than the official in idle (I have an 5770 in an arch linux machine).
    Did you set it to low power profile?

    I run all my cards in low (plenty for desktop performance) and switch to high performance only for games.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    24

    Default

    @Michael and others: How's the stability with the OSS radeon drivers recently? I'm asking because I'm using Fedora 15 and get random system hangs with my 5870 since the update to kernel 2.6.38.7 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712533) which sucks HARD. Don't have any stability problems on my Samsung N140 netbook...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    619

    Default

    The VDrift racing game results remain mixed, which is due to Mesa/Gallium3D not handling some of the shaders correctly and other incorrect renderings.
    Wrong. It's because of Catalyst not handling some of the shaders correctly. The shaders are broken and shouldn't compile on a compliant driver. And you also need floating-point textures to render everything correctly, but I guess you already know that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •