Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 68

Thread: AMD Ports Open-Source Linux Driver To Windows Embedded

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,912

    Default AMD Ports Open-Source Linux Driver To Windows Embedded

    Phoronix: AMD Ports Open-Source Linux Driver To Windows Embedded

    Here's something interesting or perhaps odd: AMD has been porting the open-source Radeon Linux driver to Windows Embedded Compact 7 (WEC7) as its graphics driver.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=16520

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    677

    Default

    A good thing I guess, it'll get more attention and they'll give it more people to work on the performance and stability of the driver if this experiment works out. I'm sure the GPL whiners are quite happy that the driver will be closed-source due to the permissible MIT license.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    77

    Default

    It would be nice if gallium/drm/winsys was ported to windows, then the driver could be compiled and run even for old hardware.

  4. #4

    Default

    Wasn't the original plan for AMD to provide the docs and for the community to write the driver?

    I wonder if taking the code written by the community, port it to windows embedded and add some proprietary sauce to it was also part of the original plan. So maybe AMD sees Linux community as a form of cheap labor?

    Of course that plan didn't work out very well. For some reason there aren't many people in the Linux community lining up to contribute to the graphics stack. I wonder if the license of the graphics stack has something to do with that

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    343

    Default

    my first reaction "WOOOOO0000T???"

    hmm.. does it change something for linux users?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    405

    Default

    Catalyst is a clusterfuck, especially on Linux. Anyone that loads it better check their sanity at the door.

    Saying it's old and crufty doesn't do it justice.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Nurnberg.
    Posts
    323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AnonymousCoward View Post
    Wasn't the original plan for AMD to provide the docs and for the community to write the driver?

    I wonder if taking the code written by the community, port it to windows embedded and add some proprietary sauce to it was also part of the original plan. So maybe AMD sees Linux community as a form of cheap labor?

    Of course that plan didn't work out very well. For some reason there aren't many people in the Linux community lining up to contribute to the graphics stack. I wonder if the license of the graphics stack has something to do with that
    The 2007 plan was quite different indeed, in countless many ways, as you all could see just a month or so ago when Michael posted our proposal to AMD.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,463

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vadi View Post
    I'm sure the GPL whiners are quite happy that the driver will be closed-source due to the permissible MIT license.
    Why do you say the driver will be closed source ?

    Quote Originally Posted by AnonymousCoward View Post
    I wonder if taking the code written by the community, port it to windows embedded and add some proprietary sauce to it was also part of the original plan. So maybe AMD sees Linux community as a form of cheap labor?
    Nope. This is a fairly recent project, conceived and started years after we got back into supporting open source graphics drivers, and the request was for a driver that could be released in source code form.
    Last edited by bridgman; 10-13-2011 at 07:11 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,634

    Default

    Thats an interesting project, however i do not see so many benefits for Linux users. At least it shows that you can reuse parts for multiple os, so why dont write a complete win/reactos driver Radeon cards are still one of the problematic parts, older ones do not work correctly even with backported drivers from debian backports and kernel 3.0. i especially mean the early radeon series. When it comes to efi boot for macs then it does not work too, intel onboard works (and nvidia binary). Not even fglrx works on mac booted via efi. More current systems work a bit better, radeon oss works mostly out of the box with limited 3d support (compared to fglrx). fglrx however is getting worse with every update. fglrx 11-9 works ok for xserver 1.7.7, but for xserver 1.10.4 it crashes with kde 4.4.5 when a simple thing like maximizing the konsole window is done and kde effects are in use. So most likely nobody here will test you WinCE driver, but there are still lots of things that could be improved by your driver team(s).

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    291

    Default

    I think some people are forgetting the goal of the embedded driver and those of catalyst are different... a 90Mb driver is probably not acceptable for an embedded system so it was probably easier to just use the smaller and nearly as proformant mesa driver with a few modifications.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •