Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Classic Radeon Drivers Are On Their Deathbed

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,178

    Default Classic Radeon Drivers Are On Their Deathbed

    Phoronix: Classic Radeon Drivers Are On Their Deathbed

    The classic Mesa Radeon (R300/R600) drivers that provide open-source OpenGL support on Linux instead of the Gallium3D alternatives are likely to be dropped in the coming days...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTAwMzY

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    176

    Default

    As far as I undersand radeon and r200 will remain, right? Thanks

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kbios View Post
    As far as I undersand radeon and r200 will remain, right? Thanks
    Correct! Because "radeon" and "r200" are not supported by gallium. Thus there is only the classic driver to provide 3D support to them. =)

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kbios View Post
    As far as I undersand radeon and r200 will remain, right? Thanks
    I still use an r200 chip, so seeing this headline made me shudder. I had largely the same question you did.

    But the radeon driver has been updated. It's just not Gallium3d.

    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Radeon3DUpdate

    Update the radeon r100/r200 3D drivers to work with kernel modesetting and DRI2.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,289

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by halfmanhalfamazing View Post
    Update the radeon r100/r200 3D drivers to work with kernel modesetting and DRI2.
    They don't already? http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    299

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wubbbi View Post
    Correct! Because "radeon" and "r200" are not supported by gallium. Thus there is only the classic driver to provide 3D support to them. =)
    This is a horribly confusing response.

    R100 and R200 are supported by classic style drivers. In those drivers, there is the DRI1 code paths and DRI2. DRI2 requires TTM and Kernel Modesetting.

    R300 and R600 are supported by both classic and Gallium drivers. In their classic drivers, again, there are DRI1 and DRI2 paths.

    Eric suggested removing the DRI1 support from the R100 and R200 drivers. Alex and Dave mentioned going ahead and removing the R300 and R600 classic drivers (both DRI1 and DRI2 paths) at the same time, but leaving the R100 and R200 DRI2 classic paths in place.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    836

    Default

    This would not only hurt Solaris and BSD, this would also hurt PPC where KMS still causes trouble (fdo bugs 30227, 37169, some more reports in Gentoo bugtracker/forums).

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chithanh View Post
    This would not only hurt Solaris and BSD, this would also hurt PPC where KMS still causes trouble (fdo bugs 30227, 37169, some more reports in Gentoo bugtracker/forums).
    If slowlaris or bsd crowd cares they should do something about this. It's such simple.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    ฿ 16LDJ6Hrd1oN3nCoFL7BypHSEYL84ca1JR
    Posts
    1,052

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chithanh View Post
    This would not only hurt Solaris and BSD, this would also hurt PPC where KMS still causes trouble (fdo bugs 30227, 37169, some more reports in Gentoo bugtracker/forums).
    Since according to the article ther isn't much work done to that drivers anyway what's the harm for them to simply package the current mesa? Or fork it?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    695

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chithanh View Post
    (fdo bugs 30227, 37169, some more reports in Gentoo bugtracker/forums).
    I dont think that the Gentoo bugtracker/forum are an good place for mesa/driver bugs

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •