Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: The Staging Merge For Linux 3.2 Kernel Is Huge

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,375

    Default The Staging Merge For Linux 3.2 Kernel Is Huge

    Phoronix: The Staging Merge For Linux 3.2 Kernel Is Huge

    Linus Torvalds was worried that the Linux 3.2 kernel might be of a worrying size due to the belated release of Linux 3.1. Merge requests are now starting to come in for the Linux 3.2 kernel and the staging merge alone touches several hundred thousand lines of code...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTAwNTY

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    462

    Default

    I noticed the following interesting bit:

    drivers/staging/zcache/zcache-main.c | 51 +-
    drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 96 +-
    drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.h | 12 +-
    drivers/staging/zram/zram_sysfs.c | 22 +-

    While these have been in the kernel for a short while, I'm having trouble finding what the updates were. lkml is currently dog-slow. Any info would be appreciated.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,995

    Default

    http://paste.pocoo.org/raw/497654/

    grep zram
    grep zcache

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,072

    Default

    Changes for crystalhd?
    Hopefully, that means that the 970015 code is being added. Previously, the 970015 driver had to be built separately since the in-kernel driver only supported 970010 and 970012. Time to dig into the changes to see if that is, in fact, what they're doing. Would be really nice and help to provide out-of-the-box crystalhd 970015 support.

    *** that means, for anyone interested, that you snap in a crystalhd chip and get to watch h264 videos with hardware acceleration withOUT having to add any weird proprietary drivers (i.e. nvidia), or any decoders that are legally questionably (i.e. ffmpeg).


    Edit: drat, doesn't mean that. Just nonsense updates to a dated driver.
    Last edited by droidhacker; 10-25-2011 at 02:07 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    462

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    Looking at the summarized CL, it appears that Ramster is on its way. Things might get neat for us data center folks with PCIE interconnects.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    953

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by russofris View Post
    Looking at the summarized CL, it appears that Ramster is on its way. Things might get neat for us data center folks with PCIE interconnects.
    Any information on how that setup would work?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •