Page 8 of 28 FirstFirst ... 67891018 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 275

Thread: Reporting spambots.

  1. #71
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    449

    Default

    simonz - comodity tips?

  2. #72
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    peter10 - copypaste bot

  3. #73
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,269

    Default

    The dude posting in many six-year old threads may or may not be one. No links yet, but short sentences, and who does that anyway?

  4. #74
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    The dude posting in many six-year old threads may or may not be one. No links yet, but short sentences, and who does that anyway?
    "adiso", right, you are correct curaga. Somehow he magically wants 500Mhz processor from 2006.. He really is a necro-lover.

  5. #75
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    449

    Default

    jeremylin - pretty much random comments, with commercial links in the signature

  6. #76
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by necro-lover
    Just for the record I'm not a spam bot and you know me.
    Not so nice to blame me for being a spam bot so they ban my adiso account and deleted all my posts.

    Maybe I write this to michael:

    "Prompt to delete my forum posts reason: partially censorship
    Since some posts were deleted without justification, I urge you to delete all of my posts.
    I can prove censorship of 100% valid posts without any violation of any forum rules in your forum.
    I do not allow you to break my author copyright by hurting my integrity of my complete work by partially censorship.

    If this prompt is not done I reserve the right to initiate legal steps to force you by law sue."

    I would be interested if he has violated a law.

    This was "adiso". He is not a bot.
    It was my failure, but his posts were very suspicious, very close to bots. Dear Michael, please unban him. I have sent him personal excuse.

  7. #77
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,269

    Default

    My mistake too. In my defense, he did act very bot-like there.

  8. #78
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    292

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycheese View Post

    This was "adiso". He is not a bot.
    It was my failure, but his posts were very suspicious, very close to bots. Dear Michael, please unban him. I have sent him personal excuse.
    I think you need another personal excuse because you posted a private message from me in the public forum without permission.
    And this one was very private because I did not send this quoted message to Michael.

    And be 100% sure this will be used against me.

  9. #79
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,538

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by necro-lover View Post
    I think you need another personal excuse because you posted a private message from me in the public forum without permission.
    Your alternate identities do this to me all the time and I'm still waiting for personal apology #1

  10. #80
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    292

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Your alternate identities do this to me all the time and I'm still waiting for personal apology #1
    Your claim do have multiple mistakes.
    First of all I do not have multiple alternate identities on Phoronix.com .
    And I never did this in the past.
    I've always had only 1 account.
    Second point is you can not quote me doing this.
    And I will explain why I can say this for sure:
    There are 2 ways to Quote a direct way in this format: "The quote in 100% the letter who writes this original" and then the name or nickname to sign the quite.
    The second way is the indirect way in the own words of the person who quote another person the format is also very difference because no quotation marks "" pop up and its end with a opinion that a person means this in the past puplic or private.
    The big difference is the first way is a statement of fact the second way is a "opinion".
    The second way is valid even if someone writes you a private letter and this person can not force you to not quote him indirectly as a "opinion" of what he means in the past.
    I did the second indirect way in the past but never a direct way as a statement of fact.
    Now you really "waiting for personal apology" for a ~opinion~ in a indirect way without any copy-past ?

    I'm sorry for quote you in a indirect way if the content do not represent your original meaning because you do have the right do show yourself in a light of truth.

    Now show me for what I have to say sorry.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •