Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 64

Thread: Concerns Over No PAE Kernel In Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,679

    Default

    When U drops PAE kernels it increases the work for other distributions which use U kernels (with small mods only). It is certainly correct that mainly the older Pentium M chips are affected, but those are definitely not slower than current Atom cpus. There is basically no need to upgrade those systems when you dont want to do more than surfing the web or writing some letters. But when you can not even install a current distro it is not fun. In the case you use more than 3 gb ram on a system which can handle not user 64 bit but pae you can always install that kernel later, should not be problematic. When you compare the kernel configs the non-pae and pae one those are very similar, so you can derive one from the other. It is definitely no huge problem to maintain two 32 bit kernels. I understand that there is no need for the 64 bit server flavour, i never complied that anyway but there should be a non-pae kernel für 32 bit systems by default. I personally think that most ppl who have got more than 3 gb ram have got already a 64 bit cpu, so in theory you could more easyly drop the pae kernel - that would affect less users...

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    353

    Default

    ciplogic: PAE is a technology to get 4+ GB of RAM on a system without having to switch to 64-bit.
    Pentium M Dothan CPU's with a 533MHz FSB support PAE very well. The "NX bit" security feature introduced on this revision of Dothan relies on PAE. Pentium M Banias, and Dothans with 400MHz FSB, didn't yet have NX bit so also don't need a proper PAE implementation as much - laptops from that time often still had 512MB of RAM, sometimes even 256, and nobody even cared about having more than 2GB. Many chipsets for laptops also didn't support over 2GB of RAM.

    Isn't there a way to detect if there's a Pentium M CPU and then disable PAE?
    Last edited by AlbertP; 11-10-2011 at 10:41 AM.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,679

    Default

    When you compile a kernel with pae then there is no way to disable that. Then you need a cpu that has support for this. Similar to a 64 bit kernel that can not run on 32 bit.

  4. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gremble View Post
    PAE kernels do not run on non-PAE machines. Been bitten by this before. This is stated clearly in the article.
    Is this a figment of your imagination? Because I can easily run PAE enabled kernels (Fedora i686 has had them for years) on pre PAE hardware and CPUs.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,679

    Default

    Maybe the pae kernel is installed on supported systems when you install it (just like U does). But on a live system it is impossible. It should be easy to verify with vbox without pae. If you have got a cpu that has got no output with

    grep -o pae /proc/cpuinfo

    then you can try it too.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    858

    Default

    That is wrong, automatic choosing of PAE/non-PAE kernel also works on live media with syslinux ifcpu64.c32 module.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by birdie View Post
    Is this a figment of your imagination? Because I can easily run PAE enabled kernels (Fedora i686 has had them for years) on pre PAE hardware and CPUs.
    Nope, not a figment at all

    http://sazwqa.wordpress.com/2008/06/...on-virtualbox/

    https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s...ux/+bug/201089

  8. #28

    Default

    Does no one else think the title of the news post is misleading for link clicks?

    "Concerns Over No PAE Kernel"

    When the discussion about no non-pae kernel? Not no pae kernel...

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,679

    Default

    @chithanh

    interesting aspect, but that requires that there EXISTS a kernel, but U wants to drop the kernel completely.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    26

    Default

    OMG, which idiots running Ubuntu on Pentium II or VIA C3? OMG, ppl are weird ...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •