Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 67

Thread: France's Institute of Nuclear Safety says all national nuclear plants aren't secure!

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    The police union point out that the radiation dosage is to high and in fact a Health risk!

    the police officers put them self into death by protect the castor's.

    http://www.cop2cop.de/2011/11/23/cas...notig-gewesen/

    the police union point out that the Castor transport had to be stopped because of the high risk.

    its a matter of fact anyone how protect the nuclear slavery take them self at risk.

    in fact the "Nuclear-Elites" just use the Police as toilet paper.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Protests escalated even before the arrival of the nuclear waste transport

    http://www.focus.de/politik/weitere-...id_687717.html

    the police use Tear gas, water cannons and batons and fight against 800 people to clear a intersection.

    seven Police officers have been injured.

    the activists use Fireworks.


    arson attack on the signaling systems of the railroad :
    http://www.stern.de/politik/deutschl...r-1755044.html

    activists burn the infrastructure of the railroad to stop the Castor.

    right now the Castor is 60km away from Germany.

    reposts talk about 'unusually large police presence'

    they calculate with many thousands of opponents against the castor.
    Last edited by Qaridarium; 11-24-2011 at 05:33 PM.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default







    "two people injured by rubber bullets used by the police."

    "The environmental organization "Sortir du nucléaire" is measured in transit by its own account in a radius of two meters higher radiation: According to her was the immediate burden on police, protesters and driver 1.65 micro Sievert per hour. It is so natural about fourteen times the radiation exposure. "This shipment is a rolling Chernobyl," said Philippe Guiter, Secretary General of the rail union Sud Rail. This time had therefore refused driver to drive the Castor trains, then managers would have to take over the French railways."

    http://m.focus.de/politik/deutschlan...id_687422.html

    yes nice "1.65 micro Sievert per hour." make sure all police officers become what they "need".
    Last edited by Qaridarium; 11-24-2011 at 05:53 PM.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    55

    Default

    1.65 uSv/h - wow that's high!

    That's just about 4 times smaller than flying in an airplane at cruise height! Police should immediately don hazmat suits!

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyberax View Post
    1.65 uSv/h - wow that's high!

    That's just about 4 times smaller than flying in an airplane at cruise height! Police should immediately don hazmat suits!
    do you think this is healthy ?

    but these people prever to get more uSv/h.

    i call it stupid.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Northwich, UK
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Now we're back on reality, I'm back

    1.65microSv/hr equates to a yearly dose (when exposed to it for 24 hours per day 365 days per year) of 14.5 mSv.

    Less than the reportable level for a nuclear worker and certainly less than many people around the world get from normal background radiation.

    Because they are only in the vicinity of the cask for a short time (certainly only a few hours per day) then the total dose they will receive will be much less than the normal background dose they will get that year.

    And remember, the dose rate will fall off as a function of the square of the distance. So if you double the distance from the cask from 2 to 4m, the dose rate drops by a factor of 4.

    Anyone living by the railway won't have anything to worry about either, their dose rate will be measured in fractions of a microSv, if it can even be measured.

    Time, distance, shielding will all reduce the dose rate.

    Andy

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    55

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Qaridarium View Post
    do you think this is healthy ?
    but these people prever to get more uSv/h.
    It's totally irrelevant.

    They are far more likely to stumble and accidentally break a neck than get a cancer from this kind of dose.

    i call it stupid.
    Duh. It takes one to know one.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default




    http://taz.de/Castor-Ticker-am-Donnerstag/!82479/

    new record 2000 school students protesting against the Castor.

    20 protesters are injured most of them because of the pepper spay and 1 woman do have hematoma and internal bleedings because of the Police action.




  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyberax View Post
    It's totally irrelevant.
    no its not irrelevant its proved unhealthy the tiniest dosage can cause cancer even the so called "save" dosage. German studies show this multiple time.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyberax View Post
    They are far more likely to stumble and accidentally break a neck than get a cancer from this kind of dose.
    and the thousand of child's and babies die by blood chancer because of the nuclear power plants ? German Studies show this multiple time.

    nuclear-Elites pay with child blood good idea.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Northwich, UK
    Posts
    65

    Default

    I knew there was something bugging me about the 1.65microSV/hr dose rate. At 2m it should be less than 1. Either someone messed up their readings (uncalibrated detector) or the shielding calculations were incorrect.

    And there is no evidence that this dose causes cancer.

    Stand near some granite and the dose will approach this value.

    Go to Iran, Brazil, parts of Africa and the natural background radiation dose is higher than this with no measurable increase in the cancer rate.

    Thousands of children and babies killed around nuclear power plants? Yeah, right. PROVE IT or fuck off.

    Q, you seem very good at renewable energy, stick to what you know, not what you read in the gutter press.

    For someone who can sound quite intelligent at times, you do type some crap.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •