Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Another Linus Rant About Linux DRM; Rejects Pull

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,639

    Default Another Linus Rant About Linux DRM; Rejects Pull

    Phoronix: Another Linus Rant About Linux DRM; Rejects Pull

    Linus Torvalds is known to make a few colorful remarks from time to time. Today he's become frustrated once again with the Linux DRM layer and has rejected a pull request for the Linux 3.2 kernel...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTAyNDA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    579

    Default

    I mean, this is pure gossip.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,765

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bulletxt View Post
    I mean, this is pure gossip.
    you have to admit however that linus's rants spice things up a bit

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 89c51 View Post
    you have to admit however that linus's rants spice things up a bit
    But when he reaches for the "masturbating monkeys" rant, shit gets real!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    141

    Default

    Kind of sucks that the kernel has only one real release cycle that's effectively forced upon everybody , even those who don't run "debian stable" so to speak, and have such hardcore stability needs that they would rather delay applying a patch that fixes something known to be broken in order to avoid the much smaller possibility of a regression.

    I say "effectively" forced upon everyone because nobody has the time to maintain a branch for backporting DRM and legitimate, "lower risk" fixes which just happen to land in the middle of a release cycle. Now that zen-unstable is dead, and linux-next isn't in what I'd call a usable state for most people, there aren't a lot of alternatives to the vanilla kernel.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    5

    Default It's not only for DRM

    Everything after -rc1 should be about regressions caused by -rc1 (the merge window). Linus has been clear about it, and DRM is not special in any way, it should follow the same rules.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    76

    Default radeon kms fix?

    I have a question, any one know what that radeon kms fix was for?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,310

    Default

    There are release schedules for a reason. If someone want to add new features or fixes for old bugs, there is a time for that. -rc4 isn't it. I am sure reasonable exceptions can be made, but it seems like Linus feels the DRM people are abusing the process and just outright ignoring the schedule, and I don't think that is okay. The whole point of an RC cycle is to test things, and you can't test things properly if they keep changing.

  9. #9

    Default

    Hooray, more sensationalist tabloid crap...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,322

    Default

    Good for Linus. He's got standards for software quality. If you're going to push untested crap into tree when the window opens, don't expect to push large patches to said crap in later rc's.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •